期刊文献+

农业保险补贴效率的影响因素分析——以新疆、黑龙江和江苏省农户的支付意愿数据为例 被引量:35

Analysis of Influencing Factors to the Efficiency of Agricultural Insurance Subsidy——A Data Research of Willingness-to-pay in Xinjiang,Heilongjiang and Jiangsu Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 预算约束通常要求极大化政策支持的社会福利。在其他条件相同的情况下,政策性农业保险补贴的社会福利取决于农民对于农业保险的需求:补贴的数量和补贴后可能得到的福利都取决于农民的真实需求。在缺乏显示性偏好的情况下,支付意愿是一种测定真实需求的常用方法。以新疆棉花保险、黑龙江玉米保险、江苏水稻、小麦保险为研究对象,利用开放的二分选择式的条件估价法(CVM)获取农户对于农业保险的支付意愿(WTP)的数据,通过相关性研究发现,农业保险的支付意愿不仅受家庭收入、产量波动、损失频率、投保作物占家庭收入比重等与农业生产风险相关的因素的影响,同时还受保险意识和对政府信任程度的影响。 Budget constraints usually require maximization of social welfare of any public support expenditure. Holding other conditions constant, the social welfare of policy subsidy to crop insurance depends on farmers' demand for crop insurance: both the amount of required subsidy and the potential welfare change are determined by farmers' true demand for crop insurance. Lack of revealed preference the willingness-to-pay (WTP) is a widely adopted approach in estimating consumers' demand. In this research, the dichotomous choice with open-ended followed up contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is applied to household survey data on WTP collected for cotton insurance in Xinjiang province, corn insurance in Heilongjiang province, and rice & wheat insurance in Jiangsu province to identify the factors influencing farmers' willingness to pay for crop insurance programs. The empirical result shows that the yield's variation, frequency of losses caused by natural hazards, family income and its share in insured crop, extent of trust on government's policy, and farmers' knowledge of crop insurance are affecting farmers' willingness to pay for crop insurance program with statistical significance.
出处 《广东金融学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期112-119,共8页 Journal of Guangdong University of Finance
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(批准号:70473040) 2006年江苏省高校研究生科技创新计划项目(编号148)
关键词 农业保险 支付意愿 条件估计法(CVM) 开放的二分选择法 crop insurance willingness to pay contingent valuation method dichotomous choice with open-ended
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1孙香玉,钟甫宁.对农业保险补贴的福利经济学分析[J].农业经济问题,2008,29(2):4-11. 被引量:95
  • 2Bishop,R.C.and T.A.Heberlein,1979.Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods:Are Indirect Measure Biased?American Journal of Agricultural Economics,Vol.61,No.5:926-930.
  • 3Hoehn,J.P.and A.Randall,1987.A Satisfactory Benefit Cost Indicator from Contingent Valuation,Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,Vol.14,No.3:226-247.
  • 4Arrow K.,Solow R.,Portney P.R.,Learner E.E.,Radner R.and H.Schuman 1993:Reportfrom the NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation,Federal Register,Vol.58,No.10:4601-4614.
  • 5Hanemann,M.,J.Loomis,and B.Kanninen,1991.Statistical Efficiency of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,American Journal of Agricultural Economics,Vol.73,No.4:1255-1263.
  • 6Bateman,I.J.,I.H.Langford,A.P.Jones.and G.N.Kerr.2001.Bound and Path Effects in Double and Triple Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation,Resource and Energy Economics,Vol.23,No.3:191-213.
  • 7苏明达.近似理想诱导支付条件评估模式之理论建构与实证检验:以黑面琵鹭保护区多样性资源价值之探讨为例[D].台湾大学农业经济学研究所博士论文,2003.
  • 8Wu,P.-I and M.-T.Su,2002.Design of an Efficient and Complete Elicitation Decision Process in Contingent Valuation Method:Benefit Evaluation of Kenting National Park in Taiwan,Paper Presented at the Second World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists,Monterev.California.U.S.A.June 24-27.

二级参考文献8

共引文献94

同被引文献249

引证文献35

二级引证文献273

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部