期刊文献+

VaR风险度量下的β系数:估计方法和实证研究 被引量:6

Beta coefficient based on value-at-risk:estimation methods and empirical analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统资本资产定价模型得出的β系数受到正态分布假设的约束。为了更好地反映金融现实,对VaR-β系数的估计问题(VaR-β系数是一种在Value-at-Risk风险度量下的β系数,可以在各种概率分布假设下应用)进行了研究。在一些常用VaR估计方法的基础上,发展了三种VaR-β系数估计方法:核密度方法、高阶矩方法和Copula方法,并得出了相应的解析表达式。最后,使用香港证券市场中的数据对核密度方法的应用进行了实证研究,并论证了置信度水平可以做为反映投资者情绪的一个指标。 In the traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), theβ coefficient is estimated with an implicit normality assumption. To reduce the gap to the reality, this paper studies the issue of estimating VaR-β, an alternative type ofβ coefficient based on Value-at-Risk (VaR) with a distribution-free specification. Based on some common VaR calculation models, we propose three different estimation methods for VaR- β: kernel density method, higher moments method and copula method. And we also derive analytical expressions for the VaR-βs under these estimation methods. Finally, an empirical analysis of kernel density method is given for Hong Kong stock market, in which we demonstrate that the confidence level can be taken as a measurement of investors' sentiment.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期27-34,共8页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金(07JA630031) 国家自然科学基金(70518001)) 国家杰出青年科学基金(70825002)
关键词 VaR-β 系数 核密度 高阶矩 COPULA VaR-β kernel density higher moments Copula
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献15

  • 1Tasche, D. and Tibiletti, L. Approximations for the value - at - risk approach to risk - return analysis [J], The ICFAI Journal of Financial Risk Management , 2004, 1 (4): 44-61.
  • 2Basak, S. and Shapiro, A. Value - at - risk - based risk management : optimal policies and asset prices [J], The Review of Financial Studies, 2001, 14: 371-405.
  • 3Campbell, R. , Huisman, R. , and Koedijk, K. Optimal portfolio selection in a value - at - risk framework [J], Journal of Banking and Finance, 2001, 25 (9): 1789-1804.
  • 4Fisher, K. and Statman, M. Investment advice from mutual fund companies [J] ,Journal of Portfolio Management, 1997, 24 (1): 9-25.
  • 5Gourieroux, C. , Laurent, J. , and Scaillet, O. Sensitivity analysis of values at risk [J], Journal of Empirical Finance, 2000, 7:225-245.
  • 6Hallerbach, W. Decomposing portfolio value - at - risk: A general analysis. Discussion paper TI99 -034/2, 1999, Tinbergen Institute Rotterdam.
  • 7Ingersoll, J.E. Theory of Financial Decision Making [M], Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa,NJ. 1987.
  • 8Jorion, P. Value at Risk : The New Benchmark for Controlling Derivatives Risk [M], McGraw -Hill, New York. 1997.
  • 9Lemus, G. Portfolio Optimization zoith Quantile - based Risk Measures [D], Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1999.
  • 10Lintner, J. The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets [J], Review of Economics and Statistics, 1965, 47. 13-37.

共引文献11

同被引文献45

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部