期刊文献+

基于不确定性度量的证据组合方法 被引量:9

Evidence combination approach based on uncertainty measure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对Dempster组合规则不能有效组合冲突证据,已有的基于证据间距离的改进组合方法计算复杂度较大的情况,提出了一种证据加权平均组合方法。首先以邓勇等人的组合方法为例计算了基于证据间距离的改进组合方法的计算复杂度,分析了造成计算复杂度较大的原因;然后通过引入证据的不确定性度量概念来描述证据的不确定性并以此为基础定义证据的权重;最后给出算法步骤。理论分析和数值算例表明,该方法能有效融合冲突证据,收敛速度快且降低了计算复杂度。 Focusing on the problem that the Dempster's combination rule cannot effectively combine conflict evidences and the high computational complexity of the present solution method based on distance between evidences, a weighted average evidence combination approach was proposed. First, the computational complexity of combination rule proposed by Deng Yong, taken as an instance of combination rules based on distance between evidences, was calculated and analyzed. Then the concept of uncertainty measure of evidence was used to describe the uncertainty of evidence body and as a basis of determining the weight of evidence. The numerical example shows that the evidence combination approach based on uncertainty measure can efficiently combine evidences, whether they conflict with each other or not, with faster convergence speed as well as lower computational complexity compared with those based on the distance between the evidences.
出处 《计算机应用》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期2257-2259,2267,共4页 journal of Computer Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60663003)
关键词 D-S证据理论 不确定性度量 信息融合 D-S evidence theory ambiguity measure information fusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

共引文献69

同被引文献65

  • 1毕鹏程,席酉民,王益谊.群体思维理论的发展及其实证研究综述[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(4):75-84. 被引量:15
  • 2黄福玉,冯玉强,王龙,芦鹏宇.基于关系模型的不确定性知识表示与推理及其在KMS中的应用[J].南京理工大学学报,2006,30(5):653-658. 被引量:8
  • 3张睿,胡孔法,陈崚.不完备信息系统的规则提取研究[J].计算机应用研究,2007,24(7):67-68. 被引量:3
  • 4G Shafer. A Mathematics Theory of Evidence[M].Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976,20-46.
  • 5KLIR G J. Remarks on "Measuring Ambiguity in the Evidence Theory" [J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2008,38(4) : 995-999.
  • 6Magnani M, Rizopoulos N, McBrien P, et al. Conceptual modeling - ER 2005 [ M ]. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin,2005 : 31 -46.
  • 7Magnani M, Montesi D. Uncertainty in data integration: Current approaches and open problems [ A ]. Proceedings of the First VLDB Workshop on Manage- ment of Uncertain Data [ C]. Enschede, The Netherlands: the Centre for Telematics and Information Technology( CTIT), 2007 : 18 - 31.
  • 8Dong X L, Halevy A Y, Yu C. Data integration with uncertainty[ J ]. The VLDB Journal, 2009,18 (2) : 469 - 500.
  • 9Madhavan J, Bemstein P A, Rahm E. Generic schema matching with Cupid [ A ]. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases [C]. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. , 2001 : 49 - 58.
  • 10Doan A H, Madhavan J, Domingos P, et al. Learning to map ontologies on the Semantic Web [ J ]. The VLDB Journal, 2003, 12(4) : 303 -319.

引证文献9

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部