期刊文献+

应用AHP与TOPSIS法评价高职学生综合素质 被引量:21

Assessment of Higher Vocational College Students' Comprehensive Quality Based on AHP and TOPSIS Methods
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高职学生的综合素质评价是一项复杂的系统工程。在记实量化的基础上,通过层次分析法确定德智体等各项指标的权重系数,然后运用TOPSIS法计算得到各学生的密切值,再根据密切值来评价学生的综合素质,并进行排序。结果表明,运用层次分析法与TOPSIS法相结合,能对学生的综合素质实现全面、合理、准确地评价,是一种简便、有效的评价方法。 Evaluation on students' comprehensive quality in higher vocational education is a complex systematic project. Firstly, based on quantitative record, the weight coefficients of various indicators of students' comprehensive quality were established by AHP method. Secondly, the Ci value of every student was calculated by TOPSIS method. Finally, evaluating students' comprehensive quality according to Ci value, and students' comprehensive quality was ranked according to the Ci value. As is shown in the result, the comprehensive quality can be evaluated objectively and comprehensively by the TOPSIS method in combination with AHP method, which can be regarded as simple and effective evaluation method.
出处 《职业技术教育》 北大核心 2009年第13期46-49,共4页 Vocational and Technical Education
关键词 高职学生 综合素质 AHP TOPSIS 评价 higher vocational school students comprehensive quality AHP TOPSIS evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1Hwang,C.L and Yoon,K.Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications[M].Springer-Verlag,Berlin,Heidelberg,1981:1-7.
  • 2YANG T,CHOU P.Solving a Multiresponae Simulation-optimization Problem with Discrete Variables Using a Multipleattribute Decision-making Method[J].Mathematics and Computers in Simulation,2005,68:9-21.
  • 3TZENGA G H,LINA C W,OPRICOVIC S M.Multi-criteria Analysis of Altemative-fuel Buses for Public Transportation[J].Energy Policy,2005,33:1373-1383.
  • 4OPRICOVIC S,TZENG G H.Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods:A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2004,156(2):445-455.

同被引文献92

引证文献21

二级引证文献64

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部