美国公民诉讼的原告资格及其借鉴意义被引量：17

The Standing of the Plaintiff of U.S. Citizen Suit and Its Inspiration

下载PDF

导出

摘要美国环境法领域中的公民诉讼制度建立于20世纪70年代,至今已有近40年的历史。其中,关于原告资格的争论一直是公民诉讼制度中最重要的问题。联邦最高法院通过Lujan和Laidlaw两个案件确立了宪法第3条所称的公民诉讼原告资格的基本判断标准。公民诉讼制度对于保障环境法律的实施具有重要的作用。对中国而言,一方面可以借鉴美国的相关经验,尽快建立我国公民诉讼制度;另一方面应当制定严格的标准,防止该制度被滥用。 40 years have passed since environmental citizen-suit provision was adopted in 1970s. During the 40 years, the controversy over the standing of the plaintiffs is one of the mast important topics in citizen suits. The supreme court of United States conceded for the standing of an individual to sue as a plaintiff through Lujan and Laidlaw. Although citizen suit plays an important role in the enforcement of environment laws, the abuse of the provision still seems endless. From China＇ s point of view, on one hand, we should learn from the United States to establish the citizen-suit provision of our own ; on the other hand, a strict standard to prevent defects is still in need.

作者齐树洁李叶丹

机构地区厦门大学法学院

出处《河北法学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第9期161-165,共5页 Hebei Law Science

基金齐树洁主持的2007年度国家社会科学基金项目"多元化纠纷解决机制与和谐社会的构建"(07BFX069)

关键词公民诉讼原告资格事实损害 citizen suit standing of the plaintiff injury-in-fact

分类号 D922.6 [政治法律—环境与资源保护法学] D925.3 [政治法律—诉讼法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1Susan George.The Public in Action:Using State Citizen Suit Statutes to Protect Biodiversity[J].University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law,Vol.6,1997,p.1,Note 55.
2George Van Cleve.Congressional Power to Confer Broad Citizen Standing in Environmental Cases[J].Environmental Law Reporter,Vol.29,1999,p.10.
3Cass R.Sunstein.What's Standing after Lujan of Citizen Suits," Injuries," and Article Ⅲ[J].Michigan Law Review,Vol.91,1992,pp.163-165.
4Fred L.Smith,Jr.Markets and the Environment:A Critical Reappraisal[J].Contemporary Economic Policy,Vol.13,1995,p.62.
5Marianne Lavene.Environmental Vise:Law,Compliance[J].National Law Journal,Aug.30,1993,p.S1.
6David R.Hodas.Enforcement of Environmental Law in a Triangular Federal System:Can Three Not Be a Crowd When Enforcement Authority Is Shared by the United States,the States,and Their Citizens[J].Maryland Law Review,Vol.54,1995,p.1552,p.1560.
7Antonin Scalia.The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers[J].Suffolk University Law Review,Vol.17,1983,pp.881,897.
8Ronald Jackson.Recent Development:American Canoe Association v.Murphy Farms,Inc.:the Fourth Circuit Reaffirms That an Environmental Organization with Article Ⅲ Standing to Sue Under the Citizen-Suit Provision of the Clean Water Act Must Satisfy the Requirements of the Gwaltney Test[J].University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law,Vol.12,2004,pp.65.
9David Krinsky.How to Sue without Standing:the Constitutionality of Citizen Suits in Non-Article Ill Tribunals[J].Case Western Reserve Law Review,Vol.57,2007,p.301.
10Jonathan H.Adler.Citizen Suits and the Future of Standing In The 21st Century:From Lujan To Laidlaw and Beyond:Stand or Deliver:Citizen Suits,Standing,and Environmental Protection[J].Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum,Vol.12,2001,p.39.