摘要
目的比较幕帘式立体铺巾法和传统铺巾法在手术应用中的效果。方法选择40例同类平卧牵引位手术,随机将患者分为两组,对患者分别采用传统的布类铺巾法和幕帘式立体铺巾法,比较两组铺巾耗时、成本、铺巾过程中手术室的空气质量、铺巾屏障的抗渗液性能等。结果幕帘式铺巾大大降低铺巾耗时、铺巾成本,且幕帘式铺巾法的手术室菌落计数显著少于传统铺巾法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),幕帘式立体铺巾法的抗渗性为100%。结论幕帘式立体铺巾方法大大缩短手术铺巾时间,降低了成本,很好地保持了洁净手术室的空气质量和具有良好抗渗性。
Objective To compare the effects of solid curtain membrane drape with traditional cotton drape in operation. Methods Forty patients of the same traction position in orthopedic op- erations were divided into two groups randomly. Traditional cotton drape and curtain membrane drape were applied in the control group and the experimental group respectively. A comparison was conducted in the preparing time, cost,air quality of the operating room and anti-permeability of two drapes. Results The curtain membrane drape cost less time and money, and left fewer colony counting significantly (P〈 0. 05) with 100% anti-permeability. Conclusion Curtain membrane drape can reduce the preparing time and cost and maintain the air quality of clean operating rooms with perfect anti-permeability.
出处
《解放军护理杂志》
2009年第14期73-74,共2页
Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
关键词
幕帘式立体铺巾法
手术室
空气质量
抗渗性
curtain membrane drape
operating room
air quality
anti-permeability