摘要
目的探讨反复上访者的司法精神病鉴定特点。方法采用自制调查表对17例反复上访者的鉴定资料进行分析,统计其上访动机、诊断及责任能力。结果上访动机:妄想支配7例(41.18%),现实动机9例(52.94%),不明动机1例;诊断:精神分裂症6例(35.29%),偏执性精神病2例(11.76%),无精神病5例(29.41%),其它4例;完全责任能力7例(41.18%),部分责任能力1例(5.88%),无责任能力9例(52.94%)。结论反复上访者多有精神异常,有关部门应考虑其是否具有病理性动机。
Objective To explore the characteristics of forensic psychiatry expertise of the repeated petitioners. Methods Appraisement data of 17 repeated petitioners were analyzed using Self-made Questionnaire(SMQ), their petitioning motivations, diagnoses and responsibility added up. Results Petitioning motivations were that 7 persons(41.18%) were governed by delusion, 9(52. 94%) real motivation and 1 unknown motivation; diagnoses were that 6 (35.29 %) were diagnosed as schizophrenia, 2 (11.76 %) as paranoid psychosis,5(29.41%) without psychosis and 4 as other diagnoses;7(41.18%) had complete reponsibility,1 (5.88%) partial and 9(52.94%) irresponsibility. Conclusion Most of repeated petitioners have mental anomaly, the parties concerned should consider if they have pathological motive.
出处
《临床心身疾病杂志》
CAS
2009年第4期356-357,共2页
Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
关键词
反复上访者
司法精神病鉴定
责任能力
Repeated petitioner
forensic psychiatry expertise
responsibility