摘要
共犯本质论是研究共同犯罪何以"共同"的问题,在这一问题上存在部分犯罪共同说与客观主义的行为共同说之间的激烈争论。共犯从属性说与独立性说是针对狭义共犯处罚根据所形成的理论学说,它与共犯本质论不应属于同一课题。"法官中立"在共犯本质问题上并不能提供实践性的标准;基于个人责任原则在共犯论中的贯彻,应以客观主义的行为共同说作为解析共犯本质的学说。
The theory of essential in accomplice just study the question of the same in accomplice, there are two theories in that question： same crime and same behavior. The theory of dependent and independent principle in accomplice is the base of narrow accomplice ; it is different from that of essential in accomplice. The impartiality of judge can not provide standard for the nature of accomplice; we should insist subjective same behavior as the theory of explain the nature of joint crimes in base of self - responsibility
出处
《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第7期42-49,共8页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
福建省社科基金一般项目<犯罪构成视野下的混合共犯研究>(2008B2047)
关键词
客观主义行为共同说
共犯从属性说
法官中立
个人责任原则
subjective same behavior
dependent principle in accomplice
impartiality of the judge
principle of self - responsibility
