期刊文献+

逻辑有效性概念:一元还是多元——图尔敏的逻辑有效性思想评析

Logical Valid Concept:One-dimensional or Multi-dimensional——Toulmin's Logic Valid Thought Evaluation
原文传递
导出
摘要 图尔敏的扩展有效性概念尽管并不完善,有的解释甚至是含混的,但是,图尔敏关于有效性概念可以扩展和变异的思想却有深刻的哲学意蕴。图尔敏扩展有效性思想给我们的方法论启迪是:有效性概念作为一个逻辑的概念是可以扩展甚至变异的。与有效性概念相关的是保真性概念。我们认为:既然有效性概念是可以变化的,那么保真性概念也是可以变化的。有效性概念的多元化必然导致保真性以外的类似于保真性的概念。在图尔敏那里,这个扩展概念就是保权性。这种逻辑概念的扩展是逻辑发展的必然需要。也是逻辑学实践转向的必然产物。 Toulmin's expansion valid concept is imperfect, some explanations even are ambiguous, but, the expand and the variation thought about the valid concept actually has the profound philosophy implication. Toulmin expansion valid thought gives our methodology inspiration is: the valid concept takes a logical concept is may expand even the variation. The valid concept is related with the fidelity concept. We believed that since the valid concept is may change, then the fidelity concept is also may change. The valid concept's multiplication causes concept outside the fidelity inevitably being similar in the fidelity concept. , Toulmin think this expansion concept is guarantees the power. This logical concept 's expansion is the logical development necessity needs. And also the inevitabie product which the logic practice changes.
作者 杨宁芳
机构地区 中国计量学院
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期20-25,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
基金 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"现代归纳逻辑的创新功能与应用及其认知基础研究"(05JZD0008)
关键词 图尔敏 逻辑有效性 扩展 Toulmin logical validity expansion
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1苏珊·哈克.罗毅,张家龙译.逻辑哲学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 2Stephen Toulmin. The Uses of Argument[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
  • 3Stephen Toulmin. The Uses of Argument[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
  • 4Stephen Toulmin, Richard Rieke, Allan Janik. An Introduction to Reasoning[M]. NewYork, Macmillan, London : Collier Macmillan, 1979.
  • 5Hitehcock D L. Sampling Scholarly Arguments..A Test of A Theory of Good Inference[M]// H V Hansen, C W Tindale,J A Blair, R .H Johnson, R C Pinto(eds). Argumentation and Its Applications. Ossa: Windsor,2002.
  • 6David Hiteheock, Bart Verheij. Arguing on the Toulmin Model[ M]. Spriner, 2006.
  • 7Eemeren F H van, Grootendorst R, Snoeek Henkemans. Fundamentals of Argunentation Theory[M]. Mahwah,NJ : Erlbaum, 1996.
  • 8John Woods. The Death of Argument: Fallacies in Agentbased Reasoning[M]. Dordrecht : Kluwer, 2004.
  • 9周礼全.形式逻辑和自然语言[J].哲学研究,1993(12):29-35. 被引量:16

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部