期刊文献+

默顿规范是高标准吗? 被引量:3

Are Merton's Norms Too High to Reach?
原文传递
导出
摘要 很多学者认为默顿规范适用于"小科学"时代的要求,如今的科学体制化经历了从"小科学"到"大科学"的演变,学界对默顿规范的质疑也越来越强烈。默顿规范真的过时了吗?默顿规范的标准真的是高标准吗?带着这两个焦点问题,我们来重新解读默顿规范,发现正是由于一些学者对默顿规范的错误理解,特别是对祛私利性规范翻译和理解的偏差,把本来是不能再低的底线行为标准,理解为是对科学家难以达到的高标准要求。从而得出默顿规范已经过时了的错误结论。默顿规范标准不仅现在没有过时,将来也不可能过时,因为离开了默顿规范的科学必将名存实亡。 Many scholars argue that Merton's Norms are applicable only in the "little science" time. As the institution of science has undergone huge changes from "little science" to "big science", Merton^s Norms are placed in doubt more and more seriously. Then, is it true that Merton's Norms are outdated? Are these norms too high to reach? With 'these two questions, we come to unscramble the norms again. In this article, it turns out that due to the misunderstandings of some scholars, especially about the norm of "disinterest", Merton's bottom--line standards are misunderstood as norms that are hardly reachable and as a result out of date. Actually, Merton's Norms are not and will not be out of time, or else, science will exist in name only.
作者 夏文利
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第7期64-68,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 默顿规范 过时 高标准 底线标准 Merton's norms outdated high standard bottom line standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献86

共引文献53

同被引文献42

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部