期刊文献+

《邶风·燕燕》“错简说”考辨 被引量:2

Verifying and Disputing of the Misplaced Bamboo Slips Opinion about "bei feng yan yan" in China′s Shijing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在古籍研究中,对是否存在错简问题一定要慎之又慎,不仅因其对正确解读文本关系重大,且求证极难。《燕燕》的前三章并不能独立成诗,它与末章是一脉贯通、前呼后应、不容分割的艺术生命体,合则神完意足,离则彼此俱残。根本不存在"误合"、"错简"的问题。 In the course of writing up the ancient books, we must be more and more careful with the case of "misplaced bamboo slips". For it is of vital importance for correctly understanding the text. And we seek evidence or verification extremely hard. The first three chapters of Swallows can't make a poem separately. The end chapter comes down in one continuous line with the first three ones. When they are combined with each other, the thought of this poem is complete and enough. There is not the issue of the "wrong combination" and "misplaced bamboo slips" at all.
作者 郎宝如
出处 《内蒙古大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期94-98,共5页 Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 《燕燕》 误合 错简 称谓转换 圆满具足 yan yan Wrong combination misplaced bamboo slips title conversion completeness
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1余冠英.诗经选[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1979..
  • 2崔述.崔东壁遗书·读风偶识[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
  • 3边家珍.《邶风·燕燕》是两诗误合?[J].学术研究,1988(2):33-33. 被引量:3
  • 4张剑.关于《邶风·燕燕》的错简[J].孔子研究,2001(2):112-114. 被引量:6
  • 5陈鼓应.老子今注今译[M].北京:商务印书馆,2003.
  • 6兰菊荪.诗经·国风今译[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1982.
  • 7宋·朱熹.诗集传[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
  • 8.礼记[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1987..
  • 9董仲舒.春秋繁露[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989..
  • 10杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局出版社,1980..

共引文献2300

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部