期刊文献+

1585例药品不良反应的费用测算和分析 被引量:5

Calculation and Analysis of Costs of 1585 Cases of Adverse Drug Reactions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:测算不同程度药品不良反应(ADR)造成的相关费用并进行比较分析。方法:采用回顾性方式,将收集的ADR病例统计筛选后分为A组(严重组)、B组(治愈组)及C组(自愈组),利用项目法和人力资本法分别测算三组病例由ADR造成的直接和间接费用,忽略隐性成本。结果:A组病例医保支付比例为30.94%,导致住院治疗时间平均11.3d,平均每例需要支付直接费用6,923.78元;B组病例医保支付比例为43.17%,平均每例需要支付直接费用83.75元;C组病例医保支付比例为20.00%,平均每例需要支付直接费用38.81元。敏感性分析提示,药品降价有助于减轻由ADR造成的直接经济损失。结论:ADR造成的费用(特别是严重病例)不容忽视,开展经济学研究应该是ADR监测工作的重点之一。 Objective: To calculate and analyze the costs of different adverse drug reactions (ADR). Method: The case reports collected in a retrospective way were divided into Group A (serious group), Group B (healed group) and Group C (naturally cured group). The direct and indirect costs of the three groups induced by ADR were calculated through item and human capital methods, and then the recessive costs were ignored. Result: The percentages of medical in- surance spent were 30:94% for Group A, 43.17% for Group B and 20.00% for Group C. The average charges of direct costs were 6,923.78 RMB for Group A, 83.75 RMB for Group B and 38.81 RMB for Group C. The average time of hospitalization was 11.3d for Group A. Also, the sensitive analysis hinted that the reduction of drug prices was benefit to ease the direct losses caused by ADR. Conclusion: The costs of ADR should not be neglected, especially in some serious cases. The research of economics was one of of the ADR monitoring key jobs.
出处 《药物流行病学杂志》 CAS 2009年第4期268-270,共3页 Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology
基金 合肥市科技局2006年度科研计划资助项目(合科[2006]27号/2006-014) 安徽省第三周期临床医学特色专科基金(卫科秘[2007]765号) 合肥市第二周期医学重点学科基金(卫科[2007]18号)
关键词 药品不良反应 费用测算 药物经济学 Adverse drug reaction (ADR) Cost calculation Pharmacoeconomics
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1孙忠实.药物不良反应的研究与对策[J].中国执业药师,2005(1):15-16. 被引量:2
  • 2CLASSENDC ,PESTOTNIKSL,EVANSRS,et al.BurkeJ.P.Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients.Excess length of stay,extra costs,and attributable mortality[J].JAMA,1997,277:301-306.
  • 3DORMANN H,MUTH-SELBACH U,KREBS S,et al.Incidence and costs of adverse drug reactions during hospitalisation:computerised monitoring versus stimulated spontaneous reporting [J].Drug Saf,2000,22:161-168.
  • 4JOHNSONJA,BOOTMANJL.Drug-related morbidity and mortality and the economic impact of pharmaceutical care [J].Am.J.Health Syst.Pharm,1997,54:554-558.
  • 5JONAS L,BENGTJ.Pharmacoeconomics of adverse drug reactions[J].Fundamental and clinical Pharmacology,2004,275-280.
  • 6谢红光 刘锦华 傅鹰.应当重视药物的安全性监测与相关费用分析[J].药物流行病学杂志,1998,7(3):129-129.
  • 7Rodriguez-Monguio R, Otero M J, Rovira J. Assessing the economic impact of adverse drug effects[J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2003, 21(9): 623-50.
  • 8Dormann H, Neubert A, Criegee-Rieck M,et al. Readmissions and adverse drug reactions in internal medicine:the economic impact [J]. J Intern Meal, 2004, 255 (6):653-63.
  • 9Lundkvist J, Jonsson B. Pharmacocconomics of adverse drug reactions[J]. Fundam Clin Pharmacol, 2004, 18(3):275-80.
  • 10Lundkvist J,Jonsson B.Pharmacoeconomics of adverse drug reactions[J].Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology,2004,18 (3):2751.

共引文献20

同被引文献64

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部