摘要
针对确证的真信念这一知识的三元定义,葛梯尔提出了批评,引发了当代对知识概念本身的分析,但人们总能在更为精致的知识定义中构造新的反例。问题产生的逻辑根源在于确证与真之间的联系;而历史地看,它是对逻辑实证主义者试图提出理想化的知识定义的质疑。知识是合理性的概念,仅当在理想的条件下被确证为真。
Gettier' s criticism of the theory of justification true belief(JTB) has inspired the discussion of the analysis of the concept of knowledge in contemporary epistemology. Nevertheless, people can figure out a more complicate counterexample to the new definition of knowledge. The rise of Gettier problem has its roots in logic, and it is the successive coordination between justification and truth; and from a historical point of view, it is a criticism of the logical positivist philosophers trying to give an ideal definition of knowledge. Knowledge is a rational concept which can only be justified in ordinary condition.
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期46-50,共5页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词
知识论
葛梯尔问题
知识概念分析
协调传递
合理性
epistemology
Gettier problem
the analysis of the concept of knowledge
successive coordination
rationality