期刊文献+

Agent动态交互信任预测与行为异常检测模型 被引量:10

Prediction and Abnormal Behavior Detection of Agent Dynamic Interaction Trust
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在agent理论中,信任计算是一个有意义的研究方向.然而目前agent信任研究都是以平均交互成功率来计算,较少考虑信任动态变化,因而准确预测和行为异常检测的能力不能令人满意.针对上述问题,以概率论为工具,按时间分段交互历史给出agent交互信任计算模型CMAIT;结合信任的变化率,给出信任计算的置信度和异常检测机制.实验以网上电子商务为背景,实验结果显示该计算模型的预测误差为TRAVOS的0.5倍,计算量也较少;既可用于对手历史行为的异常检测,防止被欺骗,又可用于对手未来行为的预测.改进了Jennings等人关于agent信任的工作. Computation of trust is an interesting research direction in agent and multi-agent systems theory. There have been a lot of researches on agent trust and reputation in the past few years, such as TRAVOS model presented by Teacy and FIRE model presented by Huynh. However, previous abnormal behavior of CMAIT is also given. It is proven that trust of average historical interaction is a particular case of CMAIT. Experiments are conducted on Web e-commerce at Taobao website. Experimental results demonstrate that computational error of CMAIT is half of that of TRAVOS and its computational complexity is also low. It can be applied in the detection of abnormal behavior and the prediction of future behavior. It improves the work of Jennings on agent trust.
出处 《计算机研究与发展》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期1364-1370,共7页 Journal of Computer Research and Development
基金 国家"九七三"重点基础研究发展计划基金项目(2007CB307100) 国家自然科学基金重大项目(60496323) 山东省自然科学基金项目(Y2005G13 Y2007G56) 山东省教育厅科技计划基金项目(J07YJ24)~~
关键词 多AGENT系统 agent信任 动态交互信任 信任计算模型 异常行为检测 multi-agent system agent trust dynamic interaction trust trust computational model abnormal behavior detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1M Mares. Fuzzy Cooperative Games: Cooperation with Vague Expectations [ M ]. New York : Physical-Verlag, 2001
  • 2J Vassileva, S Breban, M Horsch. Agent reasoning mechanism for long-term coalitions based on decision making and trust [J ].Computational Intelligence, 2002, 18(4): 583-595
  • 3S Breban. Long-term coaltions for the electronic marketplace[OL]. http://bistrica.usask.ca/madmuc/, 2002-02
  • 4Nathan Griffiths, Michael Luck. Coalition formation through motivation and trust [C]. AAMAS'03, Melboume, Australia,2003
  • 5Michael Wooldridge, Paul E Dunne. On the computational complexity of qualitative coalitional games [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2004, 158(1): 27-73
  • 6T Sandholm, K Larson, et al. Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1999,111(1-2) : 209-238
  • 7T Sandholm, V Lesser. Coalitions among computationally bounded agent [J]. Artificial Intelligence, Special Issue on Economic Principles of MultiAgent Systems, 1997, 94(1):99-137
  • 8O Shehory, S Kraus. Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation [J]. Artificial Intelligence, 1998, 101 (1-2) : 165-200
  • 9O Shehory, S Kraus. Feasible formation of coalitions among autonomous agent in non-super-additive environments [J].Computational Intelligence, 1999, 15(3): 218-251
  • 10M. Burrows, M. Abadi, R. M. Needham. A logic of authentication. The Royal Society of London, DEC Systems Research Center, Tech. Rep.: 39, 1989.

共引文献89

同被引文献68

引证文献10

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部