期刊文献+

不同麻醉药物对精神分裂症患者无抽搐电休克治疗的影响 被引量:4

Effects of different narcotics on the efficacy of MECT in schizophrenics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨依托咪酯、丙泊酚诱导麻醉后对无抽搐电休克(MECT)治疗精神分裂症患者疗效的影响。方法:将87例需要MECT治疗的精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,丙泊酚组诱导麻醉给予丙泊酚;依托咪酯组诱导麻醉换用依托咪酯,比较两组患者治疗中输入电量指数、运动发作时间、抑制指数、抽搐能量指数、抽搐一致性指数;治疗前、最后一次治疗后以阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)和韦氏记忆量表(WMS)评定其精神状况及记忆水平。结果:治疗后依托咪酯组运动发作时间、抑制指数、抽搐能量指数、抽搐一致性指数、WMS评分、PANSS减分均高于丙泊酚组(P均<0.05),而输入电量指数显著低于丙泊酚组(P<0.05)。结论:依托咪酯和丙泊酚比较可提高MECT治疗运动发作时间、抑制指数、抽搐能量指数、抽搐一致性指数,降低输入电量指数,减少认知损害,但须注意谵妄、呕吐和血压问题。 Objective: To explore the effects of anaesthesia induced by etomidate or propofol on the efficacy of MECT in schizophrenics. Methods: Eighty-seven schizophrenics needing MECT were randomly divided into propofol group their induction of anaesthesia by propofol and etomidate group by etomidate. Such indexes as input quantity of electricity, motor attack time, inhibition quotient,tic energy and tic consistency were compared bewteen the 2 groups during treatment; mental status and memory levels were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale(PANSS) and the Wechsler Memory Scale(WMS) before treatment and after the last treatment; data were processed with SPSS12.0. Results: After treatment, such indexes as motor attack time, inhibition,tic energy and tic consistency as well as WMS score and PANSS score-reducing were all higher (all P〈0.05) and input quantity of electricity index was significantly lower (P〈0.05) in the etomidate group than those in the propofol group. Conclusion: Compared with propofol,etomidate can increase motor attack time, inhibition,tic energy and tic consistency, lower input quantity of electricity and reduce cognitive impairment, but attention should be paid to delirium, vomiting and blood pressure.
出处 《陕西医学杂志》 CAS 2009年第8期1017-1019,共3页 Shaanxi Medical Journal
关键词 精神病/治疗 电刺激疗法 麻醉药 Psychotic disorders/therapy Electric stimulation therapy Anesthetice
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献23

  • 1李建伟,沈宏杰.依托咪脂用于全麻诱导对患者血流动力学的影响[J].山东医药,2005,45(2):19-19. 被引量:14
  • 2杨又春,滕宝涧.依托咪酯的不良反应及其防治[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1994,15(5):274-276. 被引量:23
  • 3温强,林小萍.硫喷妥钠、依托咪脂、丙泊酚用于全麻诱导的比较[J].华夏医学,2005,18(6):983-983. 被引量:6
  • 4Anonymous. The sixth report of the Joint National Committee On prevention , detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure. Arch Intern Med,1997;157(21): 2413.
  • 5Calhoun DA. Hypertensive crisis. In: Oparils,Weber MA. Hypertension: A Companion to Brenner and Rector's The Kindey. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2000:715~718.
  • 6Kirsten R, Nelson R, Kirsten D, et al. Clinical Pharmacokinetics of vasodiator. Clin Pharmacokinet,1998;35 : 9.
  • 7黄洁夫.新药物手册[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社,2001.364-365.
  • 8Varro M,Wrana G,Gombocz K,et al.Hemodynamic effects of propofol induction administered with target controlled infusion pump in patients scheduled for open heart surgery.Orv Hetil,2001;142(7):331
  • 9Deutschman CS,Harris AP,Fleisher LA.Changes in heart rate variability under propofol anesthesia:a possible explanation for propofol-induced bradycardia.Anesth Analg,1994; 79 (2):373
  • 10Lopatka CW,Muzi M,Ebert TJ.Propofol,but not etomidate,reduces desflurane-mediated sympathetic activation in humans.Can J Anaesth,1999;46(4):342

共引文献22

同被引文献34

  • 1杨开仁,姜小琴,毛福荣,周波,金庞,郑利锋,高晓峰,钱秀莲,余利霞.无抽搐电休克治疗抑郁症急性期临床疗效研究[J].中国全科医学,2009,12(12):1054-1056. 被引量:15
  • 2吴树跃,吴民吉,陈惜如,陈俊雄,赵纯炎,肖根秀,李植荣.无抽搐电休克对急性期精神病干预的疗效分析[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2005,5(1):49-51. 被引量:42
  • 3刘建平,夏芸.中文期刊发表的中医药系统综述或Meta-分析文章的质量评价[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007,27(4):306-311. 被引量:59
  • 4中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准[M].第3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001:75-77.
  • 5孟兆欣;鞠培娟;王宏刚.无抽搐电休克治疗抑郁症疗效观察[J]当代医学,2006(14):14.
  • 6肖桂芬;王爱敏.无抽搐电休克治疗精神障碍72例临床观察与护理[J]中国护理杂志,2007(07):62.
  • 7李乐之;路潜.外科护理学第五版[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,201273.
  • 8黄津芳.住院患者健康教育指南[M]北京:人民军医出版社,2011392.
  • 9杨菊贤;陈玉龙.内科医生眼中的心理障碍[M]上海:上海科学技术出版社,2007259.
  • 10张明园.精神科评定手册[M]长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,199334.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部