期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

基于CVM的黄河兰州段水环境恢复价值评估 被引量：2

Value Evaluation of Yellow River Environment on the Basis of Contingent Valuation Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 分析了黄河兰州段近3年的水环境污染状况,并以条件价值评估法(CVM)为依据,设计问卷并调查了兰州市居民对黄河兰州段水环境恢复的支付意愿(WTP),估算出2007年黄河兰州段水环境恢复价值为1.79亿元。针对黄河兰州段水污染提出了治理黄河兰州段环境的几点措施和建议。 This paper took an analysis of Yellow River environmem population for three years , as well as based on a method of evaluating non - market goods and services evaluation - contingent evaluation method （CVM） , designed and surveyed willingness to pay （WTP） of residents to recover environment Lanzhou Yellow River. It was estimated that value of Huanghe River environment was 1.79 × 10^8 yuan.This result provided a theory basis for protection and sustainable use of Yellow River environment.
作者 马轶君 赵勇 朵建文
机构地区 兰州资源环境职业技术学院 西北师范大学社会科学处
出处 《资源开发与市场》 CAS CSSCI 2009年第9期838-840,共3页 Resource Development & Market
关键词 黄河兰州段 水环境 条件价值评估法 价值 Yellow river Lanzhou section river environment CVM value
分类号 X196 [环境科学与工程—环境科学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1兰州市环保局环境质量公报[EB/OL].http://www.1zelm.gov.cn/file/memo. asp? id = 3355.
  • 2Hanemann WM, Kanninen B.The Statistical Analysis of Discrete response CV Data [M] .In: Bateman I J and Willis K G ed. Valuing Environmental Preferences:Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999: 302 - 441.
  • 3Davis R K. Recreation Planning as an Economic Problem[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1963, (3) :239 - 249.
  • 4张志强,徐中民,程国栋.条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J].地球科学进展,2003,18(3):454-463. 被引量：247
  • 5Mitchell D C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods:The Contin- gent Valuation Method[M]. Washington D C: Rezonrees for the Future, 1989: 85 - 102.

二级参考文献34

  • 1[11]Bateman I J, Langford I H, Turner R K,et al. Elicitation and truncation effects in contingent valuation studies[J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 12:161-179.
  • 2[12]Bonnieux F, Rainelli P. Contingent valuation methodology and the EU institutional framework [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999. 585-612.
  • 3[13]Carson R T. Valuation of tropical rainforests: Philosophical and practical issues in the use of contingent valuation [J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 24: 15-29.
  • 4[14]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation survey [J]. Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
  • 5[15]Jorgenson B S, Wilson M A, Heberlein T A. Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope [J]. Ecological Economics, 2001, 36(1): 133-148.
  • 6[17]Lovett A, Bateman I J. Economic analysis of environmental preferences: Progress and prospects [J]. Computer, Environment and Urban systems, 2001, 25: 131-139.
  • 7[18]Smith V K. Non-market valuation of environmental resources: An interpretive appraisal [J]. Land Economics, 1993, 69: 1-26.
  • 8[19]Brown T C, Gregory R. Why the WTP-WTA disparity matters [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999, 28: 323-335.
  • 9[20]Hanemann W M. The economic theory of WTP and WTA [A]. In: Bateman I J, Willis K G, eds. Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries[C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.42-96.
  • 10[21]Bishop R C, Heberlein T A. Measuring values of extra-Market goods: Are indirect measures biased? [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1979, 61(5): 926-930.

共引文献246

同被引文献35

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

资源开发与市场
2009年 第9期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部