摘要
李善注《文选.三都赋》时所采用的旧注底本应当为綦毋邃序注本,该本在张载、刘逵及卫权《三都赋》注本的基础上,增加了《三都赋序》注。在李善注《文选》时,綦氏序注本略有残缺。对于臧荣绪《晋书》与序注本在旧注作者问题上产生的分岐,李善采信了史书的记载,因此导致了后人对《三都赋》旧注的误解。
The originally-annotated copy of San Du Fu Li Shan adopted in his Annotated Wen Xuan should be the slightly incomplete copy prefaced and annotated by Qi Wusui, who based his copy on that annotated by Zhang Zai, Liu Kui and Wei Quan and added to it the annotation to "Preface to San Du Fu. " When Li Shan annotated Wen Xuan, Qi ' s annotation was incomplete. As to the difference arises between Zhang Rongxu' s Jin Shu and Qi' s prefaced annotated copy in the matter of the authors of the original annotations, Li Shan adopts the records of historical books, which leads to the misunderstanding of the later generation of San Du Fu's original annotations.
出处
《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第4期105-113,共9页
Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition