期刊文献+

医务人员椎管内分娩镇痛认知情况的调查 被引量:5

The investigation on the group differences in the cognition of labor analgesia in medical staff
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查不同医务人员群体对分娩镇痛的认知程度,探讨其对椎管内分娩镇痛开展的影响。方法对北京妇产医院麻醉科、产房、产科及其他科室医务人员群体进行分娩镇痛问卷调查。结果共发放问卷530份,收回有效答卷504份(95.1%)。在全体医务人员中,听说过椎管内分娩镇痛者占93.3%,其中清楚了解者占14.4%,48.8%的医务人员认为其他镇痛措施无效的产妇才适合椎管内镇痛,32.2%的医务人员认为非药物性方法是目前最好的分娩镇痛方法,42.4%的医务人员赞成椎管内分娩镇痛,57.4%的医务人员持不赞成也不反对态度。对于分娩镇痛知识,麻醉科医务人员84%为清楚了解,明显高于产房的18%、产科的8%和其他科室的10%(P<0.05);听说过、不了解的医务人员在产科占34%、其他科占39%,高于麻醉科的0%和产房的8%(P<0.05);对椎管内分娩镇痛持赞成态度者麻醉科为92%,高于产房的33%、产科的42%及其他科的40%(P<0.05);持不赞成也不反对态度者麻醉科为8%,低于产房的62%、产科的57%及其他科的59%(P<0.05)。结论不同部门医务人员对椎管内分娩镇痛的认知程度差别明显,提高医务人员对其利弊的正确了解,对于开展椎管内分娩镇痛工作是非常重要的。 Objective To investigate the group differences in the cognition of labor analgesia in medical staff and its influence on the application of labor analgesia. Methods A questionnaire survey was performed in medical staffs who belonged to the department of anesthesiology, delivery room, obstetrics, and others in Beijing Obstestric and Gynecologic Hospital. Results Valid questionnaires were 95.1%(504/530). About 93.3% medical staffs heard of labor analgesia, in whom 14.4% were well understood, 48.8% thought epidural analgesia may be performed only when other analgesia methods were invalid, 32.2% thought that non-drug method was the best choice for labor analgesia. In all cases 42.4% approved epidural analgesia and 57.4% were in neutrality. There were 84% staffs with well understanding of epidural analgesia in the department of anesthesiology , which was higher than the department of delivery room (18%), obtestric(8%) and others(10%)(P 〈 0.05). Staffs of obtestric(34%) and other(39%) department who only heard of labor analgesia but not well understood more than that of department of anesthesiology(0%) and delivery room(8%). 92% staffs of department of anesthesiology approved epidural analgesia, who was higher than that of delivery room (33%), obtestric (42%) and others(40%)(P 〈 0.05), 8% staffs with neutral viewpoints in department of anesthesiology was lower than that in delivery room (62%), obtestric (57%) and others (59%)(P 〈 0.05). Conclusions The cognition of labor analgesia of the medical staffs is significant different among different departments.h is important to make them well understand the labor analgesia, for improving epidural labor analgesia.
出处 《北京医学》 CAS 2009年第8期478-480,共3页 Beijing Medical Journal
关键词 医务人员 分娩镇痛 问卷调查 Medical staff Labor analgesia Questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Findley I, Chamberlain G. ABC of labour care-relief of pain.BMJ, 1999, 318: 927-930.
  • 2Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kimberger O, et al. The effect of epidural analgesia on obstetric lacerations and neonatal outcome during spontaneous vaginal delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet,2003, 267:130-133.
  • 3Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review, BMJ, 2004, 328:1410.
  • 4Zhang J ,Yancey MK, Klebanoff MA,et al. Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? a natural experiment. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 185: 128-134.
  • 5刘玉洁,曲元,张小松,刘军.蛛网膜下腔阻滞加硬膜外阻滞对母儿预后及分娩方式的影响[J].中华妇产科杂志,2005,40(6):372-375. 被引量:45
  • 6ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion number 269 February 2002. Analgesia and cesarean delivery rates. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol, 2002, 99:369-370.
  • 7曲元,吴新民.分娩镇痛新进展[J].中国生育健康杂志,2004,15(4):251-253. 被引量:9
  • 8孟冬祥,尹常宝,陈雪华,董兴栋,郭惠明,贾乃光.不同人群对无痛分娩的认知及其临床应用影响因素的调查[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2005,11(3):150-153. 被引量:20

二级参考文献39

  • 1Kanai Y, Katsuki H, Takasaki M, et al . Comparisons of the anesthetic potency and intracellular concentrations of S (-) and R (+) bupivacaine and ropivacaine crayfish giant axon in vitro. Anaesth Analg, 2000, 90: 415-420.
  • 2Gautier P, Kock MD, Steenberge AV, et al. A double-blind comparison of 0. 125 % ropicavaine with sufentanil and 0. 125 % bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90: 772-778.
  • 3Qian X, Smith H, Zhou L, et al. Evidence-based obstetrics in four hospitials in China: An observational study to explore clinical practice, women's preferences and provider's views. BMC PregancyChildbirth, 2001, 1 (1): 1.
  • 4Neal SM,Hiscock R,Anderson M,et al. A comparison of 0. 0625% ropivacaine or bupivacaine combined with fentanyl 2 μg/ml administered by patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour. Br J Anaesth, 2001, 87: 658-659.
  • 5Zundert AV, Ostheimer GW. Pain relief and anesthesia in obstetrics . New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996.4.
  • 6Abouleish E, Depp R. Acupuncture in obstetrics. Anesth Analg,1975, 54: 83-88.
  • 7Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: a new theory. scienle,1965, 150: 971-979.
  • 8mcClellan KJ, Faulds D. Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia. Drugs, 2000, 60: 1065-1093.
  • 9Benhamou D, Hamza J, Eleddjan J J, et al. Continuous extradural infusion of ropivacaine 2 mg. ml-1 for pain relief during labour. B J Anesth, 1997, 78: 748-751.
  • 10Shennan AH. Effect of low-dose mobile versus traditionlepidural techniques mode of delivery: a randimised cintrilled trial. Lancet, 2001, 358: 19-23.

共引文献71

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部