3Cai Y H. The Status and Reflection of Teacher Performance Appraisal Research. Higher Teacher Education Research. 2001, (3) :73 ~ 76.
4Cai Y H, Lin C D. The Status and Reflection of Performance Appraisal Research. The Transaction of Beijing Nomad University( Social Science Edition). 2001, (4) : 119 ~ 126.
5Borman W C, Motowidlo S J. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In: N Schmitt, W C Borman ed. Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass, 1993. 71 ~98.
6Feldman K A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external(neutral) observers. Research in Higher Education. 1989,30:137 ~ 194.
7Marsh H W, Roche L A. Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students" evaluations of teaching: popular myth, bias,validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology,2002, 92 ( 1 ) : 202 ~ 208.
8Marsh H W, Dunkin M J. Students'evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In: Smart J ed. Higher education: Handbook of Theory and Research. New York: Agathon,1992.
9Campbell J P. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: M D Dunnette, L MHough ed. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology,2nd. Consulting Psychologists Press, 1990. 687 ~ 732.
10Cai Y H. Teacher' s Job Performance: the Construction and Influence Factors Research. Doctor Degree Dissertation of Beijing Normal University. 2002.
9Borman, W. C., Motowidlo, S. J.. Expanding the crite- rion domain to include elements of contextual perfor- mance. In N. Schmitt, W. C, Borman (Eds.). Person- nel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1993.71 - 98.
10Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S.J. Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of cont- extual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1996,81(5) :525 - 531.
