期刊文献+

生长抑素联合加贝酯治疗重型急性胰腺炎 被引量:13

Therapeutic effect on acute necrotizing pancreatitis of gabexate mesilate combining with somatostatin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察生长抑素联合加贝酯治疗重型急性胰腺炎的疗效。方法选取我院重型急性胰腺炎患者53例,分为单用生长抑素组、生长抑素联合加贝酯组、生长抑素联合乌司他丁组。观察血清淀粉酶、白细胞、血糖、血钙恢复时间及腹痛、上腹部压痛缓解时间的指标差异。结果生长抑素联合加贝酯组、生长抑素联合乌司他丁组以上指标恢复时间均短于单用生长抑素组,P<0.05。生长抑素联合加贝酯组白细胞恢复时间短于生长抑素联合乌司他丁组(P<0.05),而其他指标两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论应用生长抑素联合加贝酯、生长抑素联合乌司他丁治疗重型急性胰腺炎较单独应用生长抑素效果好。生长抑素联合加贝酯组白细胞恢复时间较生长抑素联合乌司他丁组短,而两组在血清淀粉酶、血糖、血钙恢复时间及腹痛、上腹部压痛缓解时间的指标上无明显差异。 Objective To compare the therapeutic effect on severe acute pancreatitis by somatostain alone, gabexate mesilate combining with somatostatin and ulinastatin combining with somatostatin. Methods Fifty-three pa- tients with severe acute pancreatitis were enrolled. Treatment group I received intravenous gabexate mesilate combi- ning with somatostatin, and treatment group Ⅱ received ulinastatin combining with somatostatin, the control group re- ceived intravenous somatostain alone. The recovery time of serum amylase, WBC, blood glucose, blood calcium, ab- dominal pain and abdominal tenderness were observed. Results The targets above of group I and group Ⅱ was much shorter than that of the control group,P 〈0.05. The recovery time of WBC of group I was shorter than that of group Ⅱ , P 〈 0. 05, but the recovery time of serum amylase, blood glucose, blood calcium, abdominal pain and abdominal tendemess of group I and group Ⅱ had no distinct difference, P 〉 0. 05. Conclusion Intravenous gabexate mesilate com- bining with somatostatin infusion, intravenous ulinastatin combining with somatostatin is more effective than intravenous somatostatin infusion alone. The recovery time of WBC of intravenous gabexate mesilate combining with somatostatin infusion is shorter than that of intravenous ulinastatin combining with somatostatin, e 〈 0. 05, but the recovery time of serum amylase, blood glucose, blood calcium, abdominal pain and abdominal tenderness of the two group have no dis- tinct difference.
出处 《实用药物与临床》 CAS 2009年第4期247-248,共2页 Practical Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies
关键词 胰腺炎 急性坏死性 加贝酯 乌司他丁 生长抑素 Pancreatitis, Acute necrotizing Gabexate mesilate Ulinastatin Somatostatin
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Seta T, Noguchi Y, Shimada T, et al. Treatment of acute pancreatitis with protease inhibitors: a meta-analysis[ J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol,2004,16(12) :1287-1293.
  • 2刘岩,路筝,李兆申,董元航,张文俊,潘雪.APACHEⅡ、Ranson和CT评分系统对重症急性胰腺炎预后评价的比较[J].胰腺病学,2006,6(4):196-200. 被引量:39
  • 3Chen CC,Wang SS,Tsay SH,et al. Effects of gabexate mesilate on serum inflammatory cytokines in fiats with acute necrotizing pancreatitis [ J ]. Cytokine,2006,33 (2) :95-99.
  • 4Satoh H, Harada M, Tashiro S, et al. The effect of continuous arterial infusion of gabexate mesilate( FOY-O07 ) on experimental acute pancreatitis [ J ]. J Med Invest, 2004,51 ( 3-4 ) : 186- 193.
  • 5Piri M, Alhan E, Kiiouktulu, et al. The effects of somatostatin on the microperfusion of the pancreas during acute necrotizing pancreatitis in rats [ J ]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2002,49 (45) : 833 -837.
  • 6Andriulli A,Leandro G,Clemente R,et al. Meta-analysis of somatostatin, octreotide and gabexate mesilate in the therapy of acute pancreatitis[ J ]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 1998,12 ( 3 ): 237-245.
  • 7Andriulli A, Leandro G, Federici T, et al. Prophylactic administration of somatostatin or gabexate does not prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: an updated meta-analysis[ J]. Gastrointest Endose, 2007,65(4) :624-632.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Chatzicostas C, Roussomoustakaki M, Vlachonikolis IG, et al.Comparison of Ranson, APACHE Ⅱ and APACHE Ⅲ scoring systems in acute pancreatitis. Pancreas, 2002, 25: 331-335.
  • 2Imrie CW. Prognostic indicators in acute pancreatitis. Can J Gastroenterol, 2003, 17: 325-328.
  • 3Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology,1982, 143:29-36.
  • 4Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13,1992. Arch Surg, 1993, 128:586-590.
  • 5Lankisch PG, Struckmann K, Assmus C, et al. Do we need a computed tomography examination in all patients with acute pancreatitis within 72 h after admission to hospital for the detection of pancreatic necrosis? Scand J Gastroenterol, 2001,36: 432-436.
  • 6Khan AA, Parekh D, Cho Y, et al. Improved prediction of outcome in patients with severe acute pancreatitis by the APACHE Ⅱ score at 48 hours after hospital admission compared with the APACHE Ⅱ score at admission. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation. Arch Surg, 2002,137:1136-1140.
  • 7Chatzicostas C, Roussomoustakaki M, Varda E, et al.Balthazar computed tomography severity index is superior to Ranson criteria and APACHE Ⅱ and Ⅲ scoring systems in predicting acute pancreatitis outcome. J Clin Gastroenterol,2003, 36:253-260.
  • 8Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer, 1950,3:32-35.
  • 9Ross J. An empirical study of a logistic mental test model.Psychometrika, 1966, 31:325-340.
  • 10Eachempati SR, Hydo LJ, Barie PS. Severity scoring for prognostication in patients with severe acute pancreatitis:comparative analysis of the Ranson score and the APACHE Ⅲ score Arch Surg, 2002, 137:730-736.

共引文献38

同被引文献135

引证文献13

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部