期刊文献+

ICU患者经不同途径留置中心静脉导管发生感染分析 被引量:3

Analysis of the infection caused by central venous catheterization in ICU patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较分析ICU患者经不同途径留置中心静脉导管发生的感染,筛选出一种安全可靠的中心静脉留置途径。方法回顾性分析温州医学院附属第二医院ICU病区2005—12—2008—12期间留置中心静脉导管的ICU患者984例,其中经股静脉放置172例次,经颈静脉放置430例次,经锁骨下静脉放置382例次。观察导管感染情况,比较不同途径留置的中心静脉导管发生感染的差异。结果经股静脉途径留置的中心静脉导管感染率为13.1%,经锁骨下静脉途径感染率为3.2%,经颈静脉途径感染率为6.4%,三种途径导管感染率比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);三种途径导管3d内感染率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);三种途径导管7、14d感染率比较差异均有统计学意义(均P〈0.01),且随时间延长而增加;中心静脉导管感染的致病菌以革兰阳性菌为主,真菌少见。结论①ICU患者中心静脉留置导管的感染率与留置途径及时间有一定相关性,经锁骨下静脉留置导管发生感染率最低;随置管时间延长,感染率增加;②中心静脉导管感染的致病菌以革兰阳性菌为主,革兰阴性菌和真菌少见。 Objective To compare the differences of infection caused by central venous catheterization with different ways in order to choose a safe way. Methods To review the 984 patients in the Intensive Care Unit of our Hospital from December 2005 to December 2008. They were treated through femoral vein for 172 times, through subclavian vein for 382 times, and through jugular vein for 430 times. The infection rates of central venous catheterization with various approaches were compared. Results ① The infection rate of central venous catheterization was 13.1% in the patients through femoral vein, 3.2% through subclavian vein, 6.4% through jugular vein. The differences of infection rate of central venous catheterization with various ways were significant ( P 〈 0.01 ).② The 3 - day infection rate showed no differences among the three ways ( P 〉 0.05 ) , but significant differences were found on 7th and 14th day ( all P 〈 0.01 ), which increased with the prolong of the time. ③Gram - positive bacteria were the main pathogenic bacterium in the infection of central venous catheterization and the fungus was seldom. Conclusion ① There is a relationship between the infection rate of central venous catheterization and the way and the time. The infection rates of subclavian vein are the lowest and increase with the long of time. ② Gram - positive bacteria are the main pathogenic bacterium in the infection of central venous catheterization. The Gram -negative bacteria and fungus were seldom.
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期702-704,共3页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
关键词 静脉导管 感染 病原体 Central venous catheter Infection Pathogen
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献30

共引文献65

同被引文献18

  • 1朱小燕,占淑美,林美英.无缝线固定中心静脉导管的护理[J].中国实用护理杂志,2005,21(7):77-77. 被引量:19
  • 2Chopdekar K,Chande C,Chavan S,et al. Central venous catheter-related blood stream infection rate in critical care units in a tertiary care, teaching hospital in Mumbai [J]. Indian J Med Microbiol ,2011,29(2): 169-171.
  • 3Luft D,Schmoor C,Wilson C,et al. Central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection and colonisation of insertion site and catheter tip. What are the rates and risk factors in haematology patients [J]. Annals of Hematology,2010,89( 12): 1265-1275.
  • 4Gahlot R, Nigam C, Kumar V, et al. Catheter - related blood- stream infectlons[J]. Int J Crit Illn Inj Scl, 2014,4(2) : t62 - 167.
  • 5Mansur FJ, Barai L, Karim MM, et al. Intravascular catheter re- lated infections and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of isolated bacteria in a tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh[ J]. Indian J Med Microbiol, 2014, 32 (1) : 68 -71.
  • 6Martfnez - Morel HR, S6nchez - Pay6 J, Molina - G6mez M J, et al. Catheter - related bloodstream infection : burden of disease in a tertiary hospital[J]. J Hosp Infect, 2014, 87(3) : 165 -170.
  • 7Bouza E, Eworo A, Femrndez Cruz A, et al. Catheter- related bloodstream infections caused by Gram- negative bacteria[ J ]. J Hosp Infect, 2013, 85(4) : 316 -320.
  • 8罗红.大面积烧伤患者预防中心静脉置管感染的护理体会[J].医学信息,2013(26):340.
  • 9王敏.ICU导管相关性血流感染危险因素分析及预防措施[J].当代护士(中旬刊),2009,16(10):8-11. 被引量:6
  • 10陈永强.导管相关性血流感染与中心静脉导管集束干预策略[J].中华护理杂志,2009,44(10):889-891. 被引量:360

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部