期刊文献+

西方道德判断模式理论的新进展 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 传统的道德判断理论一直遵循理性主义模式,主张道德判断主要通过推理和思考而得,然而近来一种新的理论——社会直觉模式对此提出了挑战,认为道德判断是由迅速自动的直觉所导致。本文从道德判断的概念入手,阐述了传统的理性模式及哲学背景、直觉模式对理性模式的质疑和理论观点,最后对两种模式进行了述评。
出处 《外国中小学教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第8期16-21,26,共7页 Primary & Secondary Schooling Abroad
基金 海南省教育厅高等学校科学研究资助项目"不同情境中大学生道德判断模式的研究"(项目批准号:Hjsk2009-80)
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Jonathan Haidt.The emotional dogs and its rational tail:A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.Psychological Review,2001.108(4):814-834.
  • 2Albright.L..Kenny.D.A.& Mallov.I.E.Consensus in personality judgment at zero acquaintance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1988.55:387-395.
  • 3Devine.P.G.(1989).Stereotypes and prejudice:The automatic and controlled components.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1989.56:5-18.
  • 4Chaiken.S.The heuristic model of persuasion.In M.P.Zanna.J.M.Olson.& C.P.Herman(Eds),Social influence:The Ontario symposium.Hillsdale.NJ:Erlbaum.1987.
  • 5Nisbett,R.E.& Schacter.S.Cognitive manipulation of pain.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.1966,2:227-236.
  • 6Zimbardo.P.G..LaBerge.S.& Butler,L.D.Psychophysiological consequences of unexplained arousal:A posthvpnotic suggestion paradigm.Journal of Abnormal Psychology.1993.102:466-473.
  • 7Gazzaniga.M.S.,Bogen.J.E..& Sperry.R.W.Some functional effects of sectioning the cerebral commissures in man.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.USA.1962.48:1765-1769.
  • 8Blasi.A.Bridging moral cognition and moral action:A critical review of the literature.Psychological Bulletin.1980.88:1-45.
  • 9Kohlberg.L.Stage and sequence:The cognitive developmental approach to socialization.In D.A.Goslin(Ed.).Handbook of socialization theory and research.Chicago:Rand McNally.1969.
  • 10Rest.J.R.Development in judging moral issues[M].Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press.1979.

同被引文献16

  • 1何亚云,冯江平.道德理论的新进展——道德判断的社会直觉模式[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1190-1191. 被引量:16
  • 2徐平,迟毓凯.道德判断的社会直觉模型述评[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):403-405. 被引量:35
  • 3Haidt, J. The New Syn thesis in Moral Psychology[J].Science, 2007,(316) : 998-1002.
  • 4Haidt, J. The emotional dogs and its rational tail: A social intu- itionist approach to moral judgment[J]. Psychological Review, 2011,108(4):814-834.
  • 5A班杜拉.思想和行动的社会基础--社会认知论[M].林颖,等译.武汉:华东师范大学出版社,2001:694-703.
  • 6Chen S, Shechter D, Chaiken S. Getting at the Truth or Getting along: Accuracy-versus Impression Motivated Heuristic and Systematic Processing[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1996,(71):262-275.
  • 7Greene,J.D.,&Haidt,J.How(and where)does moral judgment work?[J]. Trends in Cognitive Science,2002(6) :517-523.
  • 8科尔伯格.道德判断的测量[M] .英文版.[出版地不详]:[出版单位不详],1987(1): 1819.
  • 9Nisbett.R.E.& Schacter.S.Cognitive manipulation of pain[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1966(2):227-236.
  • 10Gazzaniga.M.S.&Sperry.R.W.Some functional effects of the cerebral commisure in man Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences[J]. US-A ,1962,48:1765-1769.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部