期刊文献+

风险决策任务中时间距离对框架效应的影响 被引量:13

Influences of Temporal Distance on the Framing Effect in Risky-choice Tasks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过考察中国大学生时间距离的认知相关性,并进而探讨时间距离对风险决策任务加工方式及框架效应的影响。实验一通过问卷调查发现,与发生时间相对较远的事件相比,相对较近的事件,其认知相关性更大,验证了时间距离的认知相关性假设。在此基础上,以时间距离为自变量,设计不同的风险决策任务,考察框架效应发生的可能性(实验二、实验三)。结果显示,时间距离近时,框架效应不明显;时间距离远时,框架效应明显。其原因是,发生在相对不远的将来事件引起分析加工模式,导致框架效应的减弱;发生在相对远的将来事件引起整体加工模式,导致框架效应的增强。 This study was to investigate Chinese college students' temporal distance cognitive relativity, and to discuss the influence of temporal distance on the processing of risky-choice tasks and the framing effect. In Experiment 1, the result of the questionnaire survey showed greater cognitive relativity for the relatively near future events compared with the more distant future events. This result supported the'temporal distance cognitive relativity hypothesis. Based on Experiment 1, temporal distance was an independent variable in Experiment 2 and Experiment 3. Then different risky-choice tasks were designed and the possibility of the framing effect was investigated. The result showed that a clear framing effect only occurred in the long temporal distance condition; when temporal distance was shortened, the framing effect was not clear. The reason was that events occurring in the relatively near future let to analysis processing which weakened the framing effect; but events occurring in the more distant future led to holistic processing which enhanced the framing effect.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期920-922,919,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 全国教育科学"十一五"规划重点研究课题资助(项目号:DBA080171)
关键词 时间距离 框架效应 分析性加工 整体性加工 temporal distance, framing effect, the analysis processing, the holistic proeeasing.
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Kahneman D,Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47:263 - 291.
  • 2Todd M, Dminic M. What is going to happen? How temporal distance influences processing for risky - choice framing tasks? Social Cognition, 2007,25, (4) :495 - 517.
  • 3Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choice, Values and Frames. Cambridge University Press, UK: Cambrige, 2000 : 245 - 256.
  • 4Davis M A, Bobko P. Contexual Effects on Escalation Processes in Public Sector Decision Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 1986, 37:121 - 138.
  • 5Levin L, Gaeth GE. How Consumers are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information before and after Consuming the Product. Journal of Consumer Research, 1988, 15 : 374 - 378.
  • 6Fagley NS, Miller PM . Framing effects and arenas of choice : Your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1997,71 : 355 - 373.
  • 7Wang XT. Domain Specific Rationality in Human Choices: Violations of Utility Axioms and Social Context. Cognition, 1996, 60:31-63.
  • 8LeBoeuf RA, Shafir E . Deep thoughts and shallow frames : On the susceptibility to framing effects. Journal of behavioral decision making, 2003, 16:77-92.
  • 9Bless H, Betsch T, Franzen A. Framing the framing effect : The impact of context cues on solutions to the Asian disease problem. European Journal of social Psychology, 1998, 28:287 - 291.
  • 10Wang XT, Simons F, Bredart S. Social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of behavioral decision making, 2002,14:1 - 15.

二级参考文献30

  • 1张文慧,张志学,刘雪峰.决策者的认知特征对决策过程及企业战略选择的影响[J].心理学报,2005,37(3):373-381. 被引量:55
  • 2Davis. M A & Bobko, P. Contextual effects on escalation processes in public sector decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986,37,121 -138.
  • 3Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 1984,39(4) ,341 - 350.
  • 4Kahneman, D & Tversky, A. The Psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 1982,246, 162- 170.
  • 5Dunegan, K J. Framing, cognitive modes, and image theory toward an understanding of a glass full. Journal of applied Psychology, 1993,78, 495 - 503.
  • 6Budner S A. Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 1962, 30:29-50
  • 7Smith S M, Levin, I P. Need for Cognition and Choice Framing Effects, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1996, 9:283-290
  • 8Petty R E, Cacioppo J T. Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1979, 37:1915 - 1926
  • 9Chiu C Y, Morris M W, Hong Y Y, Menon T. Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 78:247-259
  • 10Kardes F R, Cronley M L, Kellaris J, Posavac S S. The role of selective information processing in price-quality inference. Journal of Consumer Research, 2004, 31 : 368 - 374

共引文献83

同被引文献152

引证文献13

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部