期刊文献+

信息技术能力对企业绩效影响机制的实证研究 被引量:13

Empirical Research on Influencing Mechanism of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借鉴IT应用模式及组织能力的分类,将信息技术能力(IT能力)分为开发式IT能力和探索式IT能力。从组织决策的视角,剖析了IT能力对企业绩效的影响机制,提出了相应的概念模型和理论假设。然后,以制造企业为对象,以调查问卷的方式回收数据,共回收有效问卷178份,并对上述模型和假设进行实证检验。研究结果表明,IT能力对企业绩效的作用不是直接的,企业决策在两者之间的关系中起中介作用;开发式IT能力通过影响操作决策进而影响企业绩效;探索式IT能力通过影响管理决策进而影响企业绩效。 According to patterns of IT use and the category of organizational capabilities, we divide IT capab of IT ilities into IT capability for Exploitation and IT capability for Exploration. The influencing mechanism capabilities on firm performance is analyzed from the perspective of organizational decision-making Conceptual model and hypotheses are formulated. Then, the questionnaire sheets are sent to manufacturing firms. The valid data from 178 manufacturing firms is used to test above model and hypotheses. Empirical results show that IT capabilities can't impact firm performance directly. Operational decision-making has significant mediating effects on the relationship between IT capabilities for exploitation and firm performance, and managerial decision-making has significant mediating effects on the relationship between IT capabilities for exploration and firm performance.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第8期151-156,共6页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 浙江省自然科学基金项目"浙江省再制造逆向供应链契约协调研究"(y607538) 浙江省社会科学学术著作出版资助项目"IT能力对企业绩效的影响机制研究"(08CBB35) 杭州市哲学社会科学规划课题"杭州制造企业IT能力的机理分析与实证研究"(B08GL05)
关键词 IT能力 开发 探索 企业决策 企业绩效 IT capabilities exploitation exploration organizational decision-making firm performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1吴晓波,胡保亮,蔡荃.运用信息技术能力获取竞争优势的框架与路径研究[J].科研管理,2006,27(5):53-58. 被引量:31
  • 2Bbsradwaj,A.S.A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance:An empirical investigation[J].MIS Quarterly,2000,24(1):169-196.
  • 3March,J.G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
  • 4Ozsomer,A.,Gencturk,E.A resource-based model of market learning in the subsidiary:The capabilities of exploration and exploitation[J].Journal of International Marketing,2003,11(3):1-29.
  • 5Subramani,M.How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships?[J].MIS Quarterly,2004,28(1):45-73.
  • 6Mata,F.J.,Fuerst,W.L,Barney,J.B.Information technology and sustained competitive advantage:A resource-based analysis[J].MIS Quarterly,1995,19(4):487-505.
  • 7Wade,M.,Hulland,J.The resource-bused view and informarion systems research:Review,extension,and suggestions for future research[J].MIS Quarterly,2004,28(1):107-143.
  • 8Tippins,M.J.,Sohi,R.S.IT competency and firm performance:Is organizational learning a missing link?[J].Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(8):745-761.
  • 9Sambamurthy,V.,Bharadwaj,A.,Grover,V.Shaping agility through digital options:Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms[J].MIS Quarterly,2003,27(2):237-263.
  • 10Teng,J.T.C.,Calhoun,K.J.Organizational computing as a facilitator of operational and managemential decision-making:An exploratory study of managers' perceptions[J].Decision Sciences,1996,27(4):673-710.

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]H. J. Leavitt, T. L. Whisler. Management in the1980' s[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1958, (36): 41-48.
  • 2[2]Barrie R. Nault, Information Technology and Organization Design: Locating Decisions and Information[J] . Management Science, 1998, 44(10): 1321-1335.
  • 3[3]Barrie R. Nault, Albert Dexter, Added Value and Pricing with Information Technology[J] . Quarterly of Management Information System, 1995.
  • 4[4]Barrie R. Nault, Mitigation Underinvestment through an IT-enabled Organization Form[J]. Organization Science,1997, 8(3): 223 -234.
  • 5[5]Michael C. Jensen, William H. Meckling, Specific and general Knowledge, and Organizational Structure, Contract Economics. Lars Werin and Hans Wijkander, Eds. 251-274.
  • 6[6]Coase, Ronald H., The Problem of Social Cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960, (10): 1-44.
  • 7[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 8[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 9[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 10[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321

共引文献7859

同被引文献222

引证文献13

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部