期刊文献+

美国公司因进口不锈钢管质量问题在美国法院诉上海上上不锈钢管公司案评析

Comment on the Case: Salem Steel North America, LLC v. Shanghai Shangshang Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 上海上上不锈钢管公司向北美萨勒姆钢铁公司出售不锈钢管供其在美国转售,后因质量问题,萨勒姆公司在其住所地美国新泽西州联邦地方法院对上上公司提起诉讼。上上公司依《联邦民事诉讼规则》第12(b)(2)条提起撤案动议,认为法院不具有属人管辖权,请求驳回原告起诉。法院认为上上公司与新泽西州间存在最低联系、且对其行使管辖权不违反传统的公平与实质正义观念,因此,法院驳回了上上公司的撤案动议。本文介绍了该案的基本案情、归纳了法院的裁决理由、并对本案作了简要评析。 This article is about the case of Salem Steel North America, LLC v. Shanghai Shangshang Stainless Pipe Co., Ltd.. Shangshang sold stainless pipe to New Jersy-based Salem for resale in the United States. Due to quality problems, Salem filed a complaint before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersy alleging claims for breach of contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and tortious interference with a contract. Shangshang instituted a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. The Court finds minimum contacts exist between Shangshang and New Jersy, and asserting jurisdiction over Shangshang is fair and reasonable, thus, Shangshang's motion to dismiss is denied. This article briefly introduced the facts of the case, analysed the reasoning of the Court's decision, and commented on the significance of the case.
出处 《国际商务研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第4期28-33,共6页 International Business Research
关键词 属人管辖权 长臂管辖权 最低联系 personal jurisdiction long-arm jurisdiction minimum contacts
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1Slip Copy, 2009 WL 1652395. June 11, 20090.
  • 2Rule 12(b) How to Present Defenses. Every defense to a claim for relief in any pleading must be asserted in the responsive pleading if one is required. But a party may assert the following defenses by motion:...(2) lack of personal jurisdiction.
  • 3Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S.A.v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408, 416, 104 S.Ct. 1868, 80 L.Ed.2d 404(1984).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部