摘要
Hyland(1999,2005)通过对学术论文语篇的元语篇分布情况的实证分析探讨哲学语篇和科学语篇异同。本文认为学术论文是集学术语篇和学科语篇为一体的文本,无法清晰的反映哲学语篇和科学语篇其本身固有的特点。本文通过直接考察科学著作和哲学著作的人际元语篇的分布情况指出:科学语言的元语篇的使用具有中立性的特点,其主旨是组织语篇,使之具有语篇性;哲学语篇中的高值情态使用率较高,哲学的"先验"性使得其语言主观、精炼、肯定。
Hyland （ 1999, 2005 ） discusses the distribution of metadiscourse in philosophical discourse and scientific discourse. This paper holds that disciplinary discourses fused into academic papers could not manifest their true features. Through the analysis of the lexical - grammatical features in these two discourses, the paper points out that the function of metadiscourse for scientific discourse is to organize the discourse and thus give the texture to it, and that for philosophical discourse is to express the subjective, precise and non - negotiated argument due to the transcendental feature of philosophy.
关键词
哲学语篇
科学语篇
元语篇
Philosophical discourse
scientific discourse
metadiscourse
