期刊文献+

颈动脉支架置入术后3年随访结果分析

Three-year follow-up of patients after carotid angioplasty and stenting
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)在预防脑梗死方面的远期效果。方法选择接受颅外段CAS患者55例,定期随访3年。根据CAS后发生缺血性脑血管事件(4例)和未发生缺血性脑血管事件(51例)进行比较。并分析CAS后血管再狭窄情况。结果在55例完成3年随访的CAS患者中,4例(7.3%)出现了终点事件的患者均为脑梗死。其中3例患者缺血事件对应的脑梗死在支架置入同侧,1例患者缺血事件对应的脑梗死在支架置入对侧。单因素分析发现,年龄>75岁、高血压史、有两个以上脑血管病危险因素、术后未系统服用抗血小板药物、术前有多次脑梗死病史的患者术后容易发生缺血性脑血管事件(P<0.05)。3年随访观察,有3例(5.5%)发生了再狭窄。结论 CAS能有效降低动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄患者脑卒中发生风险。CAS后中远期再狭窄率较低。 Objective To analyze long-term outcome of carotid artery stenting(CAS) in patients with atheroselerotie diseases. Methods Fifty-five patients who had received CAS and finished 3 years follow-up in a general hospital were enrolled as subjects. Patients were grouped into with(4) and without(51) recurrence of ischemic cerebral events. The restenosis after CAS was analyzed. Results During the 3 years follow-up,4 patients(7.3%0) had recurrent ischemic events. Of the 4 recurrent patients,3 had infarctions ipsilateral as the CAS; and 1 had infarction contralateral to the CAS. Univariate analysis indicated that age 〉75 years,history of multiple risk factors for cerebrovascular diseases, absence of systematic anti-platelet treatment after CAS, multiple infarctions before CAS were associated with cerebral ischemic events after CAS. Three(5.5%) patients developed restenosis after CAS. Conclusion CAS can efficaciously decrease stroke morbidity in patients with atherosclerotic diseases. Restenosis rate is relatively low during the medium-term follow-up.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第8期570-572,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 支架 危险因素 预后 脑血管意外 随访研究 carotid stenosis stents risk factors prognosis cerebrovascular accident follow-up studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Ohira T, Shahar E, Chambless LE, et al. Risk factors for ischemic stroke subtypes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study. Stroke, 2006,37 : 2493-2498.
  • 2Agabiti-Rosei E, Muiesan ML. Carotid atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness and stroke events. Adv Cardiol,2007,44 : 173-186.
  • 3Wholey MH. Current status of carotid artery stent placement. J Cardiovasc Surg, 2006,47 : 101-105.
  • 4Aburahma AF, Bates MC, Eads K, et al. Safety and efficacy of carotid angioplasty/stenting in 100 consecutive high surgical risk patients : immediate and long-term follow-up. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2008,42: 433-439.
  • 5Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med,2004,351 : 1493-1501.
  • 6Hobson RW. Update on the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial(CREST) protocol. J Am Coll Surg,2002,194 :S9-S14.
  • 7Rundek T,Sacco RL. Risk factor management to prevent first stroke. Neurol Clin, 2008,26: 1007-1045.
  • 8Ling AJ, Mwipatayi P,Gandhi T, et al. Stenting for carotid artery stenosis: fractures, proposed etiology and the need for surveillance. J Vasc Surg, 2008,47 : 1220-1226.
  • 9Fisher M, Paganini-Hill A, Martin A, et al. Carotid plaque pathology: thrombosis, ulceration, and stroke pathogenesis. Stroke, 2005,36 : 253-257.
  • 10Setacci C,Chisci E,Setacci F,et al. Grading carotid intrastent restenosis: a 6-year follow-up study. Stroke, 2008,39: 1189- 1196.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部