期刊文献+

癫痫幼儿与正常幼儿自我延迟满足的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Self-imposed Delay of Gratification between Children with Epilepsy and Normal Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索脑损伤对自我控制的影响。方法:本研究应用经典的自我延迟满足实验对癫痫幼儿和正常幼儿的自我控制行为进行比较研究。受试包括来自大连市内医院记录在案的9名癫痫幼儿和来自大连市普通幼儿园的36名正常幼儿(年龄为4~5岁)。结果:癫痫组幼儿的平均延迟时间短于正常组幼儿[(76±75)svs.(591±308)s,P<0.001]。在11种延迟策略由低到高的4种水平上,癫痫幼儿在水平Ⅱ寻求策略和水平Ⅲ自我分心、问题解决策略上得分均低于正常幼儿[(2.11±2.42)vs.(24.33±20.56),(2.11±2.62)vs.(12.69±11.79);均P<0.001]。在水平Ⅱ上,癫痫幼儿寻求母亲和寻求目标得分均低于正常幼儿[(0.67±0.87)vs.(2.83±3.90),(1.44±1.88)vs.(21.50±19.13);均P<0.01];在水平Ⅲ上,动作分散和静坐得分低于正常幼儿[(1.22±1.72)vs.(11.33±10.18);(0.22±0.67)vs.(2.56±4.91),均P<0.01]。结论:癫痫引起的大脑损伤导致癫痫幼儿自我延迟满足能力的发展水平明显滞后于正常同龄幼儿,癫痫幼儿带有明显的低自我控制倾向。 Objective: To explore the relationship between cerebral damage and self-control. Methods: The subjects included 9 children with epilepsy from a hospital and 36 normal children from a general kindergarten, and all of them were aged 4 - 5 years. Their self-control capacities were compared by self-imposed delay of gratification task Result: The children with epilepsy had shorter delayed time than the normal group [ (76 ±75) s vs. (591 ± 308 ) s, P 〈 0. 001 ] . Among 11 strategies of four levels, the epilepsy children had lower scores compared with the normal group in the pursuant strategies of level Ⅱ and in the self-distraction and problem-solving strategies of level Ⅲ [ (2.11±2.42) vs. (24.33±20.56), (2.11±2.62) vs. (12.69±11.79); P〈0.001] . Children with epilepsy had much lower scores than the normal group both in pursuant mother and pursuant target of level Ⅱ strategies[ (0.67±0.87) vs. (2.83±3.90), (1.44±1.88) vs. (21.50±19.13); P〈0.01] . They also had much lower scores than the normal group in action distraction and silent sitting of level Ⅲ strategies [ ( 1.22 ± 1.72 ) vs. (11.33±10.18); (0.22±0.67) vs. (2.56±4.91), P〈0.01] .Conclusion: Compared with normal children at the same age, children with epilepsy have lower self-control tendency, which may be related to the cerebral damage caused by epilepsy.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第8期595-598,608,共5页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金(30170323) 高等学校博士学科点专项基金(20040165002) 国家社科基金(教育类)(BBA080048)
关键词 自我控制 自我延迟满足 癫痫幼儿 正常幼儿 比较 self-control self-imposed delay of gratification child with epilepsy normal child comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1金星明 李雪融 林庆 等.中国学龄前儿童的十大问题行为.大众医学,2004,(6):6-9.
  • 2June TP, Roy BF, Luzio BA. High self control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success [ J] . Journal of Personality, 2004, 72 (2) : 271 -324.
  • 3Coumoyer M, Turdel M. Behavioral correlates of self-control at 33 months [ J] . Infant Behavior and Development, 1991, 14 (4): 497-503.
  • 4Shoda Y, Mischel W, Peake PK. Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions [J] . Developmental Psychology, 1990, 26 (6) : 978 - 986.
  • 5杨丽珠,宋辉.幼儿自我控制能力发展的研究[J].心理与行为研究,2003,1(1):51-56. 被引量:81
  • 6杨丽珠,王江洋,刘文,Monica Cuskelly,Airong Zhang.3—5岁幼儿自我延迟满足的发展特点及其中澳跨文化比较[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):224-232. 被引量:52
  • 7Metcalfe J, Mischel W. A hot/cool analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower [ J ].Psychological Review, 1999, 106 (1): 3-19.
  • 8Sabbagh SEI, Soda C, Escolano S, et al. Impact of epilepsy characteristics and behavioral problems on school placement in children [ J ] . Epilepsy & Behavior, 2006, 9 : 573 - 578.
  • 9汤慈美 王新德.神经心理学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2001.254-270.
  • 10Gortmaker SL, Walker DK, Wertzman M, et al. Chronic conditions, socioeconomic risks, and behavior problems in children and adolescents [ J ]. Pediatrics. 1990, 85 : 267 - 76.

二级参考文献35

共引文献194

同被引文献14

  • 1张利萍,王美芳.攻击性儿童的社会认知特点及其教育干预策略[J].当代教育科学,2005(11):44-46. 被引量:5
  • 2苏科,李菁.儿童攻击性行为研究[J].中北大学学报(社会科学版),2006,22(5):86-88. 被引量:7
  • 3Normandeau S,Guay F.Preschool behavior and first-grade school achievement:the meditational role of cognitive self-control.J Educ Psychol,1998,54:687-696.
  • 4Hueber ES.Initial development of the Students Life Satisfaction Scale.School Psychol Int,1991,12:231-240.
  • 5Mischel W.Introduction to Personality.London:Harcourt Brace College Publisher,1999,6:478-480.
  • 6Eron LD.What becomes of aggressive school-children? Harv Ment Health Lett,1998,14:8.
  • 7Mischel W.The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification.J Pers Soc Psychol,1998,54:687-696.
  • 8Mischel W.Delay of gratification in children.Science,1989,244:933-938.
  • 9Mischel H,Mischel W.The development of children's knowledge of self-control strategies.Child Development,1983,53:603-619.
  • 10Perner J,Lang B,Kloo D,et al.Theory of mind and self-control:more than a common problem of inhibition.Child Development,2002,73:752-767.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部