期刊文献+

经直肠前列腺超声造影参数成像的临床应用研究 被引量:4

The clinical practice of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound with parametric imaging for differential diagnosis of prostatic nodules
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经直肠前列腺超声造影参数成像在鉴别诊断前列腺结节性质的临床应用价值。方法临床疑诊为前列腺癌的59例患者根据前列腺穿刺活检病理结果分为良性前列腺增生组(BPH)和前列腺癌组(PCa),于超声造影前,在二维灰阶模式下记录前列腺结节大小,并采用彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)记录结节内血流情况。然后在前列腺结节最大切面下行超声造影检查,采集病灶的10个造影参数,即曲线下面积(AUC)、平均渡越时间(mTT)、灌注指数(PI)、达峰时间(TTP)、峰值强度(IMAX)、停留时间(ResT)、上升时间(RT)、曲线上升支斜率(WiR)、曲线下降支斜率(WoR)及两斜率乘积(WiR×WoR),相应每个彩色编码的参数图像可自动获得,采用参数成像软件SonoProstate进行分析。结果对59例患者63个前列腺结节的超声造影参数统计分析发现,除AUC外其余9个参数两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);前列腺癌组mTT、TTP、ResT及RT较良性前列腺增生组低,而PI、IMAX、WiR、WoR与WiR×WoR较良性前列腺增生组高。10个参数间的两两组合共有44种,其中39种参数间组合的双变量相关分析有统计学意义(P≤0.01或P≤0.05)。24种参数间两两组合为正相关关系,15种参数间两两组合为负相关关系。结论经直肠前列腺超声造影参数成像技术能够有效获得反映造影剂灌注特征的参数值,并有助于前列腺结节性质的鉴别诊断。 Objective To evaluate the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CETRUS) in differential diagnosis of prostatic nodules. Methods A total of fifty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. All patients took CETRUS examination and lesion-targeted TRUS guided biopsy successively on the same day. The characteristics of parametric imaging were observed and 10 parameters were measured with SonoProstate software. The values of data were statistically analyzed by t' test, Kendall' s correlation and Spearman correlation test. Results The patients were classified into BPH (26 patients) and PCa (33 patients) groups according to pathological findings. The nine parameters were significant different between 2 groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). The value of each parameter in PCa and BPH groups was shown respectively as follow: mTT(21.94 ± 8.89 vs 38.09 ± 22.31 ) ,PI(42.02 ± 23.17 vs 22.68 ± 13.29) ,TTP( 10.72 ± 3.04vs 13.38 ± 4. 18) ,IMAX(41.45 ± 22.69 vs 22.85 ± 12.79) ,ResT(17.95 ± 10.39 vs 41.34 ± 36.25),RT(8.72±2.87 vs11.22±3.91),WiR(8.89±5.98 vs4.47±3.77),WoR(1.75 ±1.17 vs 0.72± 0.53) ,WiR × WoR (21.12± 26.86 vs 4.33 ± 6.35 ). There were 44 matches of parameters, in which 39 matches were significant different ( P 〈 0.05 ). Twenty-four matches were positive correlation, while 15 matches were negative correlation. Conclusions The values of parameters which reflect characteristics of perfusion mode can be achieved by parametric imaging and can help for identifying prostatic nodules.
出处 《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》 2009年第4期36-39,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound(Electronic Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金(30772179)
关键词 腔内超声检查 造影剂 前列腺肿瘤 前列腺增生 鉴别诊断 Endosonography Contrast media Prostatic neoplasmas Prostatic hyperplasia Differential diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Catalona WJ,Richie JP,Ahman FR.Amulticenter evaluation of PSAand digital rectal examination (DRE)for early detection of prostate cancer in6,371volunteers[].Journal d Urologie.1993
  • 2Tang J,Yang JC,Zhang Y,et al.Does benign prostatic hyperplasia originate from the peripheral zone of the prostate-Aprelimi-nary study[].BJU International.2007
  • 3Cooner WH,Mosley BR,Rutherford CL,et al.Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen[].Journal d Urologie.1990
  • 4Justin A,Siegal AB,Enyou Y,et al.Topography of neovascularity in human prostate carcinoma[].Cancer.1995
  • 5Brawer M K,Deering R E,Brown M,et al.Predictors of pathologic stage in prostatic carcinoma: the role of neovascularity[].Cancer.1994
  • 6Weidner N,Semple JP,Welch WR,et al.Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis correlation in invasive breast carcinoma[].New England Journal of Homeopathy.1991
  • 7Halpern,EJ,Strup,SE.Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer[].American Journal of Roentgenology.2000
  • 8Langer JE.The current role of transrectal ultrasonography in the evaluation of prostate carcinoma[].Seminars in Roentgenology.1999
  • 9Patel U,Rickards D.The diagnostic value of colour Doppler flow in the peripheral zone of the prostate,with histological correlation[].British Journal of Urology.1994
  • 10Tang J,Yang JC,Luo Y, et al.Enhancement characteristics of benign and malignant focal peripheral nodules in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland studied using contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound[].Clinical Radiology.2008

同被引文献45

  • 1Sieqel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin, 2013,63 ( 1 ) : 11-30.
  • 2Stricker PD, Frydenberg M, Kneebone A, et al. Informed pros-tate cancer risk-adjusted testing: A new paradigm. BJU Int, 2012, 110(Suppl 4) :30-34.
  • 3van Niekerk CG, van der Laak JA, BOrger ME, et al. Computer- ized whole slide quantification shows increased microvascular den- sity in pT2 prostate cancer as compared to normal prostate tissue. Prostate, 2009,69(1) : 62-69.
  • 4Arakawa A, Soh S, Chakraborty S, et al. Prognostic significance of angiogenesis in clinically localized prostate cancer (staining for Factor Ⅷ-related antigen and CD34 Antigen. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 1997,1(1) :32-38.
  • 5Bettencourt MC, Bauer JJ, Sesterhenn IA, et al. CD34 immuno- histochemical assessment of angiogenesis as a prognostic marker for prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol, 1998,160(2) :459-465.
  • 6Smeenge M, Mischi M, Laguna Pes MP, et al. Novel contrast- enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer. World J Urol, 2011,29(5) :581-587.
  • 7Jiang J, Chen Y, Zhu Y, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonogra- phy for the detection and characterization of prostate cancer: Cor- relation with microvessel density and Gleason score. Clin Radiol, 2011,66(8) :732-737.
  • 8Valentino M, De Matteis M, Casadio Baleni M, et al. Contrast- enhanced US of the prostate with time/intensity curves: Prelimi- nary results. J Ultrasound, 2008,11(1) :8-11.
  • 9Jung EM, Wiggermann P, Greis C, et al. First results of en- docavity evaluation of the microvascularization of malignant prostate tumors using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in- cluding perfusion analysis: First results. Clin Hemorheol Micro- circ, 2012,52(2-4) : 167-177.
  • 10Xie SW, Li HL, Du J, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonogra- phy with contrast-tuned imaging technology for the detection of prostate cancer: Comparison with conventional ultrasonography. BJU Int, 2012,109(11):1620-1626.

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部