期刊文献+

基于网络层次分析法的非专利药项目风险测评研究 被引量:2

On the Risk Evaluation Model of Generic Drug Project Based on an Analytic Network Process(ANP)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 每年世界上有大量的专利药失去专利保护,为我国制药厂商进入国际非专利药市场带来了前所未有的机遇,但同时非专利药项目开发存在着巨大的风险。因此有必要对项目风险进行评测。非专利药项目开发风险评测模型是基于网络层次分析法的基本原理,结合非专利药新品开发的特点,通过构建非专利药项目的两级风险评价指标,并在对各指标间的相互关系进行了深入调研的基础上,绘制出了非专利药项目开发风险测评网络层次图。然后利用Super Decision(SD)软件对非专利药项目开发风险进行量化测评,评测结果对于厂商规避风险,选择合适的非专利药项目进行开发具有很好的指导作用。文章最后还应用该模型对非专利药项目开发风险进行了测评。 Every year, a large number of medicines lost their patent protection in the world, providing unprecedented opportunities for Chinese pharmaceutical manufactures to develop the generic drugs, but simultaneously there is a huge risk for the development of new generic drugs. In this paper, we have built the risk evaluation model for the development of new generic drug projects, which based on the principles of the analytic network process. We have studied the characteristics of the development of new generic drug projects and built two levels risk assessment indicators in this model. We developed the ANP risk assessment maps for new generic drug project by investigating the relationship of the indicators thoroughly. This model can easily quantify the risks facing the new generic drugs projects by using the software of super decisions(SD).It provides a good guidance for generic medicine manufactures to avoid risk and choose the proper new generic drug projects. Finally, this model also was applied to the risk assessment in the development of new generic drugs.
出处 《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2009年第4期63-67,共5页 Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家创新基金项目(06c26211200048)
关键词 非专利药项目 网络层次分析法 风险评测 generic drug development network-level analysis risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1许关煜,李敏华.欧美疏通非专利药上市渠道[J].上海医药,2004,25(8):372-374. 被引量:3
  • 2Visiongain. The World Generics Market 2006-2011 [EB/OL], http://www.marketresearch.com/product/display.asp?productid = 1302217&g=1. 2006-05-18/2008-06-22.
  • 3G.L.Trittle, E.F.V. Scriven. Fusfeld. Resolving uncertainty in R&D portfolios [J]. Research and Technology Management, 2000,43 (6):47-55.
  • 4T.Faulkner. Applying options thinking to R&D valuation [J]. Research and Technology Management, 1996,39:50-5.
  • 5D.L. Hall, A. Naudia. An interactive approach for selecting R&D project [J].IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1990,37:126-133.
  • 6D.W. Patterson. Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems [M]. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Prentice Hall, 1990.
  • 7F.Zahedi. The analytic hierarchy process-A survey of the method and its applications [J]. Interfaces, 1996,16, 108-108.
  • 8A.C. Garavelli, M. Gorgoglione, B. Scozzi. Fuzzy logic to improve the robustness of decision support systems under uncertainty [J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1999,37: 477-480.
  • 9S.S.Rao, A. Nahm, Z. Shi. Artificial intelligence and expert systems applications in new product development-a survey[J], Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 1999,10 (3):231-244.
  • 10R.F. Riek. From experience: Capturing hard-won NPD lessons in checklists [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management , 2001, 18: 301-313.

共引文献2

同被引文献7

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部