期刊文献+

战略理论与商务模式理论差异浅析 被引量:1

A Concise Analysis of the Difference Between Strategy Theory and Business Model Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章研究了战略理论和商务模式理论的差异,认为主要表现为:战略理论将企业的外围环境视为静态的、一成不变的东西,并将直接的产业竞争环境的不确定性和复杂性视为对企业一种潜在威胁,因此企业应评估关键战略要素的机会和风险,采取前瞻性措施最大程度地规避这种潛在威胁,而企业价值是企业凭借其独特的市场定位或所拥有的核心能力单独创造出来并应独自享有。与此相对,商务模式理论将企业经营的各个子环境视为一个有机整体,将企业外部环境的不确定性和复杂性视为企业的一种潜在机遇,因而企业应积极调整经营活动组合,加速商务模式创新,充分调动各利益相关者的积极性,以充分攫取和适度分享不确定环境中的商机。 This research indicates that the difference between strategy theory and business model theory mainly lies in the following. Strategy theory treats firm's surrounding environment as a static and constant thing, and treast the uncertainty and complexity of direct industry competitive environment as a potential threat to firm. So firm must evaluate the opportunity and risk of crucial strategic factors and take forward-looking actions to prevent this potential threat. Meanwhile, firm value is created wholly by firm's specific market orientation or by core competence it possesses and should all be accrued to firm accordingly. Comparatively, business model theory treats a variety of subenvironment of firm's operation as an organic integer and treats the uncertainty and complexity of firm's surrounding environment as a potential opportunity to firm. So firm should adjust the combination of business operations, accelerate the innovation of business model, motivate the enthusiasm of stake-holders, so as to appropriate fully and share adequately business opportunities embedded in uncertain environment.
出处 《华东经济管理》 CSSCI 2009年第8期104-108,共5页 East China Economic Management
关键词 战略理论 商务模式理论 环境认知 环境应付 价值分配 strategy theory business model theory perception of environment response to environment value allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Magretta J. Why Business Models Matter [ J ]. Harvard Business Review, 2002, (5) : 86 - 92.
  • 2麦克尔·库苏曼诺,康斯坦丁诺斯·马凯斯下一波经济的战略思考[M].北京:华夏出版社,2003.
  • 3Porter M E. What Is Strategy [ J]. Harvard Business Review, 1996, (11).
  • 4李振勇.商业模式:企业竞争的最高形式[M].北京:新华出版社,2006.
  • 5Rumeh R, Schendel P D, Teece D J. Strategic Management and Economics [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1991, (12) : 5-29.
  • 6Porter M E. Competitive Strategy [ M ]. New York: Free Press, 1980.
  • 7Wernerfeh B. A Resource - based View of the Firm [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 198d, (5) : 171 -180.
  • 8Barney J B. Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, (17) :99- 120.
  • 9Rumelt R P. Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm [ J ]. Competitive Strategic Management, 1984, ( 26 ) : 556 - 570.
  • 10Dierickx I, Cool K. Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Adva-ntage [ J ]. Management Science, 1989, (35) : 1504-1513.

二级参考文献31

  • 1翁君奕.差别产品的动态完全竞争[J].中国工业经济,2005(9):106-113. 被引量:9
  • 2翁君奕.商务模式创新[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004..
  • 3Jay. B. Barney. Firm Resource and Sustained Competitive Advantage[J]. Journal Management,1991,17(1).
  • 4Russell Thomas. Business Value Analysis: Coping with Unruly Uncertainty[J]. Strategy & Leadership,2001,29(2).
  • 5Eric Beinhocker & Sarah Kaplan. The Real Value of Strategic Planning[J]. Sloan Management Review,Winter,2003,44(2).
  • 6Mashiko Aoki. The Co-operative Game Theory of the Firm[M]. Oxford: Claredon Press,1984.
  • 7Michael R. Dietrich. Transaction Cost Economics and Beyond: Towards a New Economics of the Firm [M].London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
  • 8Paul J. H. Schoemaker. Strategy, Complexity, and Economic Rent[J]. Management Science, 1990,36 (10).
  • 9Thomas Powell. Competitive Advantage: Logical and Philosophical Considerations [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22 (9).
  • 10Richard Makadok. Toward a Synthesis of the Resource-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001,22 (5).

共引文献244

同被引文献47

  • 1Brown S L, Eisenhardt K M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and timepaced evolution in relent- lessly shifting organizations [J]. Administrative Science Quar- terly, 1997,42( 1 ) : 1-34.
  • 2Koberg C, Detienne D, Heppard K. An empirical test of envi- ronmental, organizational, and process factors affecting incre- mental and radical innovation [J]. The Journal of High Tech- nology Management Research, 2003,14 (1):21-45.
  • 3Russell R, Russell C. An examination of the effects of organi- zational norms, organizational structure, and environmental uncertainty on entrepreneurial strategy [J]. Journal of Manage- ment, 1992,18(4) : 639-656.
  • 4Covin J G, Slevin D P, Heelewy M B. Pioneers and followers: competitive tactics, environment and firm growth [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 1999, 15(2): 175-210.
  • 5Ozsomer A, Calantone R, Benedetto A D. What makes firms more innovative? A look at organizational and environmental factors [J]. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 1997, 12(6) :400-416.
  • 6Naranjo Gil D. The influence of environmental and organiza- tional factors on innovation adoptions: Consequences for per- formance in public sector organizations [J]. Technovation, 2009,29(12) :810-818.
  • 7Germain R. The Role of Context and Structure in Radical and Incremental Logistics Innovation Adoption [J]. Journal of Business Research, 1996,35(2) : 117-127.
  • 8Zhou K Z, Yim C K. Tse D K. The Effects of Strategic Orienta- tions on Technology and Market-Based Breakthrough Innova-tions [ J ]. Journal of Marketing, 2005,69 (2) : 42-60.
  • 9Uzkurt C, Kumar R, Kimzan H S, et al. The impact of envi- ronmtntal uncertainty dimensions on organisationalinnova- tiveness: an empirical study on SEMs [J]. International Jour- nal of Innovation Management, 2012, 16(2) : 1-23.
  • 10Kreiser P, Marino L. Analyzing the Historical Development of the Environmental Uncertainty Construct [J]. Management Decision, 2002,40(9) : 895-905.

引证文献1

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部