期刊文献+

Meta分析中发表偏倚的Begg’s检验、Egger’s检验及Macaskill’s检验的SAS程序实现 被引量:27

Applying the SAS Program to the Complete Begg’s Test,the Egger’sTest,and the Macaskill’s Test for Publication Bias of Meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Meta分析的结论易受各种偏倚的影响,"发表偏倚"是其中重要的偏倚之一。所以,评价所纳入的研究是否存在发表偏倚是Meta分析的一项重要的前期准备工作。Begg’s检验、Egger’s检验和Macaskill’s检验是常见的用于定量评价Meta分析"发表偏倚"的方法,为了便于这些检验方法的应用,本文编写了基于SAS系统的这三个检验的程序,经实例数据分析,其运行结果与Stata软件完全相同。为研究人员提供了同时实现这三个检验的有效途径。 The conclusions of meta-analyses are susceptible to various of biases, and publication bias is one of such main bias. Therefore, Checking for evidence of publication bias should be undertaken routinely at the preliminary stage of a meta-analysis. Begg's test, Egger's test, and Macaskill's test are usually used to objectively identify publication bias in meta-analyses. In order to conveniently use these methods, the SAS program of these three tests was designed in this paper. In order test practical data, the fact that the output of this program of SAS software was consisted with the output of STATA software was validated. So, this program is an alternative way to do such hypothesis tests to identify the publication bias in meta-analyses.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 2009年第8期910-916,共7页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家科技部973课题(2002CB512910)
关键词 META分析 发表偏倚 Begg’S检验 Egger’S检验 Macaskill’S检验 Meta-analysis Publication bias Begg's test Egger's test Macaskilrs test
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias: A problem in interpreting medical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 1988, 151(3): 419-463.
  • 2Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ, 1994, 309(6964): 1286-1291.
  • 3Dickersin K. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Education and Prevention, 1997, 9(1 Suppl): 15-21.
  • 4Begg CB. Publication bias. In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Cooper H, Hedges LV (eds). Russell Sage Foundation: New York, 1994, Chapter 25.
  • 5Light RJ, Pillemer DB. Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Harvard University Press: Cambridge MA, 1984.
  • 6Greenland S. Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol, 1994, 140: 290-296.
  • 7Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 1994, 50: 1088-1101.
  • 8Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 1997, 315: 629-634.
  • 9Macaskill P, Walter SD, Irwig L. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. Stat Med, 2001, 20: 641-654.
  • 10Kendall MG. A New Measure of Rank Correlation. Biometrika, 1938, 30(1-2): 81-93.

同被引文献568

引证文献27

二级引证文献202

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部