期刊文献+

颈前路减压及融合节段的确定方法分析

Selection of Segment of Anterior Decompression,and Reconstruction of Bone Graft
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨颈前路减压及融合节段的确定。方法对手术治疗的32例颈椎病,分别摄术前及术后随访之颈椎正侧位、伸屈侧位X线片及颈椎MR检查。32例均经前路行减压、植骨融合、内固定手术治疗。以颈椎不稳节段与颈椎主要退变节段重合,并行减压内固定患者7例;对25例颈椎不稳与颈椎病节段不重合,其中仅处理颈椎病节段9例;在处理颈椎病节段同时处理颈椎不稳节段16例。以JOA"17"评分法分别对患者术前、术后随访情况予以评价,对数据行均值t检验。结果经12~36个月随访(平均25个月),所有患者均获骨性融合,平均改善率61.2%。均值t检验:术前、术后差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论颈椎前路减压及融合术,合理选择颈减压及融合节段可获得满意的临床效果。 Objective To investigate the the selection of the segment of anterior decompression,and the reconstruction of bone graft.Methods Thirty-two patients with the cervical spondylosis undergoing the anterior decompression,the reconstruction of bone graft,and the fixation were included.The standard and dynamic X-ray radiographs and the cervical MR were taken preoperatively and postoperatively.Superposition between the segment of cervical spondylosis and cervical instabilities in 7 patients; No superposition and only treatment with the segment of cervical spondylosis, in 9 patients; No superposition and treatment with the cervical spondylosis and cervical instabilities at the same time in 16 patients. The preoperative and postoperative conditions were evaluated by"JOA 17"scoring value. The data were compared statistically with Student' s t - test. Results Fusions were reached in all patients during the mean followup 25 months (range 12 -36 months). The mean improvement rate was 61.2 %. Between preoperatively and postoperatively, there were significant differences in the data with paired t - test ( P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusion Satisfactory clinical outcome can be achieved by proper selection of the segment of anterior decompression, the reconstruction of bone graft.
作者 杨勇
出处 《医药论坛杂志》 2009年第13期3-5,共3页 Journal of Medical Forum
关键词 减压 融合 颈前路 Decompression Reconstruction of bone graft Anterior
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1贾连顺.注重颈椎病的临床研究,提高远期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):547-548. 被引量:12
  • 2姜建元,马昕,夏军,陈文钧,吕飞舟,黄煌渊.退行性颈椎不稳的手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2003,23(9):554-557. 被引量:22
  • 3申勇,张英泽,吴华荣,任东风,丁文元,张为.退行性下颈椎不稳症的早期手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(5):297-300. 被引量:19
  • 4向选平,陈德玉,何志敏,郭永飞.颈前路Interfix与Syncage-C的临床应用比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(4):241-243. 被引量:3
  • 5Edwards CC, Riew KD, Anderson PA, et al. Cervical myelopathy: current diagnostic and treatment strategies [ J ]. Spine,2003,3:68-81.
  • 6Hilibrand A, Fye M, Emery S. Improved arthrodesis with strutgrafting after multi-level anterior cervical decompression [ J ]. Spine,2002,27:146-151.
  • 7Truumees E, Herkowitz HN. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy [ C ]. In instructional course lectures, American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons, 2000,339-360.
  • 8Epstein NE, Silvergleide RS, Black K. Computed tomography validating bony ingrowth into fibula strut allograft:a criterion for fusion[J].Spine J,2002,2(2) :129-133.
  • 9Hayashi H, Okada K, Hamada M, et al. Etiologic factors of myelopathy. A radiographic evaluation of the aging changes in the cervical spine. Clin Orthop, 1987,21:200
  • 10Kawakarni M,Tamaki T. Ando M, et al. Preoperative instability does not influece the clinical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated with expansive laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech,2002,15 : 277

共引文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部