期刊文献+

催眠暗示心理疗法对复诊性病患者心理防御方式的影响 被引量:1

The Effects of Hypnotic Suggestive Therapy on the Psychological Defense Pattern of Recurrent STD patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的调查复诊性病患者的心理防御方式及催眠暗示心理疗法对其影响。方法350例复诊性病患者随机分成2组,每组175人。1组(A组)采用催眠暗示心理疗法+常规治疗,另1组(B组)采用常规治疗,采用防御方式问卷(DSQ)进行测查,并与120例正常人作对照组进行比较分析。结果复诊性病患者2组治疗前不成熟防御方式明显高于正常对照组人群(P<0.01),成熟防御、中间防御及掩饰因子与正常人比较无明显差异(P>0.05);治疗后不成熟防御方式A组与B组比较有明显差异(P<0.05),当2组仍高于正常对照组人群。结论复诊性病患者的心理防御方式存在异常,催眠暗示心理疗法能改善其心理防御方式。 Objectives To investigate the psychological defense pattern of recurrent STD patients and effects of hypnotic suggestive therapy. Methods 350 recurrent STD patients were randomly divided into group A and B with equal cases. Group A was treated by routine treatment plus hypnotic suggestive therapy, and group B was treated by routine treatment only. Both groups were inquired by defense styles questionnaive(DSQ), comparing with contrast group containing 120 normal people. Results The immature defense styles in both groups of recurrent STD patients were significantly higher than that of normal controls(P〈0.01). There were no obvious difference in mature defense, intermediate defense and disguise factors between patients and normal controls(P〉0.05). Statistical difference of immature defense styles between group A and B were observed(P〈0.05), and they were both higher than normal controls. Conclusion The psychological defense pattern of recurrent STD patients is abnormal, and hypnotic suggestive therapy may be helpful in improving it.
出处 《中外医疗》 2009年第23期9-9,13,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 性病 心理防御方式 防御方式问卷 催眠暗示心理疗法 STD Psyehological defense patiern Defease styles questionnaire Hypnotic suggestive therapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TS, Lenke LG, et al. Somatosensory and motor-evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery z An accepted standard of care. Spine, 1998,23 : 1392-1400.
  • 2Berggren L, Eriksson I, Mollenholt P, et al. Sedation for fibreoptic gastroscopy: a comparative study of midazolam and diazepare. Br J Anaesth,1983,55:289-296.
  • 3Van der Bijl P, Roelofse JA. Disinhibitory reactions to benzodiazepines: a review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1991,49 : 519-523.
  • 4Hall RC,Zisook S. Paradoxical reactions to benzodiazepines. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1981 ,11(Suppl 1) :995-1045.
  • 5Roelofse JA, Stegmann DH, Hartshorne J, et al. Paradoxical reactions to rectal midazolam as premedication in children. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1990,19:2-6.
  • 6Khan LC, Lustik SJ. Treatment of a paradoxical reaction to midazolam with haloperidol. Anesth Analg, 1997,85:213-215.
  • 7Thurston TA, Williams CG, Foshee SL. Reversal oI a paradoxical reaction to midazolam with flumazenil. Anesth Analg, 1996,83:192.
  • 8White PF, Way WL, Trevor AJ. Ketamine-its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. Anesthesiology, 1982,56 ; 119-136.
  • 9Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 1990,10:244-251.
  • 10Edewards M, Serrao JM, Gent JP, et al. On the mechanism by which midazolam causes spinally mediated analgesia. Anesthesiology, 1990,73:273-277.

共引文献156

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部