期刊文献+

基于分离机制互联网络的移动性管理研究 被引量:2

Mobility Management Research of Internet based on Split Mechanism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于分离机制提出一种新的互联网结构。该结构明确分离主机身份和其位置信息,分离传输层和网络层的地址功能,直接支持移动性。该结构明确分离互联网接入网和核心网,接入网和核心网内的IPv6路由伸缩性增强。本文重点给出基于分离机制的互联网移动性管理协议,支持基于主机和基于网络的移动性管理。给出移动性管理费用和切换延迟的解析模型,分析移动性和系统参数对移动性管理费用和切换延迟的影响。分析结果表明基于分离机制的互联网移动性管理协议由于位置管理相关消息经历网络处理节点较多,切换延迟较大,同时基于网络的移动性管理在减小切换延迟方面有较大优势。 This paper presents a new Internet architecture based on the split mechanism. It cleanly separates the host location from its identity and explicitly supports mobility by separating the transport layer function from the network layer function in addresses. It cleanly separates the Internet access networks from the core net-work. It makes IPv6 routing both in access networks and the core network more scalable. Specially, this paper gives the mobility management protocol of the proposed Internet architecture. It supports host-based and net-work-based mobility management. Also, we develop analytic models for the mobility management costs and handover latency. Then, the impacts of mobility and system parameters on mobility management costs and handover latency are analyzed respectively. The results reveal that the handover latency of the proposed mobility management protocol is bigger due to location management messages across more network process nodes and the network-based mobility management is better than the host-based mobility management in handover latency.
出处 《铁道学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期65-74,共10页 Journal of the China Railway Society
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2007CB307100) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60870015 60833002 60674008)
关键词 身份 接入地址 核心地址 分离 移动性管理 identify access address core address split mobility management
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Meyer D, Zhang L, Fall K. Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing [S]. IETF RFC 4984, 2007.
  • 2NewArch project: future-generation Internet architecture [EB/OL]. http://www. isi. edu/newarch/, 2008 08-19.
  • 3FIND: future Internet network design [EB/OL]. http:// find. isi. edu, 2008-08-19.
  • 4GENI: global environment for network innovations [EB/OL]. http://www. geni. net, 2008-08-19.
  • 5杨冬,周华春,张宏科.基于一体化网络的普适服务研究[J].电子学报,2007,35(4):607-613. 被引量:40
  • 6Burness A, Eardley P, and Iannone L. Locater ID proposal evaluation [S]. IETF Internet, draft-burness-locid-evaluate-01, 2008.
  • 7Massey D, Wang L, Zhang B, Zhang L. A Scalable Routing System Design for Future Internet [C]// SIGCOMM IPv6 Workshop, 2007.
  • 8Johnson D, Perkins C, Arkko J. Mobility Support in IPv6 [S]. IETF RFC 3775, 2004.
  • 9Devarapalli V, Patel A, Leung K, Chowdhury K. Mobile IPv6 Bootstrapping for the Authentication Option Protocol [S]. IETF Internet, draft-devarapalli-mip6-authprotocolbootstrap 02, 2007.
  • 10Gundavelli S, Leung K, Devarapalli V, Chowdhury K, Patil B. Proxy Mobile IPv6 [S]. IETF RFC 5213, 2008.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Clark,David D.Name,Addresses,Ports,and Routes[S].RFC 814,July,Internet Engineering Task Force,1982.
  • 2J Saltzer.On the Naming and Binding of Network Destinations[S].RFC 1498,Internet Engineering Task Force,August 1993.
  • 3J Pang,J Hendriicks,A Akella,R De Priscco,B Maggs,S Seshan.Availability,usage,and deployment characteristics of the domain name system[A].IMC' 04[C].Sicily,Italy,October 25-27,2004.1-14.
  • 4p2psim[EB/OL].http://pdos.lcs.mit.edu/p2psim.
  • 5S Kang,M Fields,Experimental Study of the SCTP compared to TCP[R].Computer Communications and Networking Fall 2003.
  • 6第十八次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[EB/OL].http://www.cnnic.net.cn.
  • 7GENI:global environment for network innovations[EB/OL].http://www.geni.net.
  • 8A Bavier,N Feamster,M Huang.In VINI veritas:realistic and controlled network experimentation[A].ACM SIGCOMM[C].Pisa,Italy,2006.3-14.
  • 9David Clark,Robert Braden.FARA:reorganizing the addressing architecture[A].ACM SIGCOMM[C].Karlsruhe,Germany,2003.33(4):313-321.
  • 10FIND:future Internet network design[EB/OL].http://find.isi.edu.

共引文献39

同被引文献26

  • 1张宏科,苏伟.新网络体系基础研究——一体化网络与普适服务[J].电子学报,2007,35(4):593-598. 被引量:126
  • 2董平,秦雅娟,张宏科.支持普适服务的一体化网络研究[J].电子学报,2007,35(4):599-606. 被引量:59
  • 3Gundavelli S,Leung K,Devarapalli V,et al.RFC5213Proxy Mobile IPv6[S].IETF,2008.
  • 4Clark D,Braden R,Falk A. FARA:Reorganizing the addressing architecture[A].New York:ACM,2003.
  • 5Meyer D,Zhang L,Fall K. Report from the IAB Workshop on Routing and Addressing,RFC4984[OL].http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc4984.html,2010.
  • 6Clark D,Sollins K,Wroclawski J. Addressing reality:An architectural response to real-world demands on the evolving Internet[A].New York:ACM,2003.
  • 7Saltzer J. On the Naming and Binding of Network Destinations,RFC 1498[OL].http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=1498,2010.
  • 8Hayes V. Wireless LAN medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications[M].Piscataway:IEEE Standards Board,1999.
  • 9Pack S,Choi Y. Fast inter-AP handover using predictive authentication scheme in a public wireless LAN[A].Piscataway,NJ:IEEE,2002.15-26.
  • 10Mishra A,Shin M,Arbaugh W. Pro-active key distribution using neighbor graphs[J].IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications,2004,(01):26-36.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部