期刊文献+

伴髓系抗原表达的高危儿童急淋白血病临床生物学特征及长期预后分析 被引量:1

Clinical,biological and long-term prognostic analysis in high-risk childhood ALL with myeloid antigen expression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析髓系抗原阳性(My+)的儿童高危急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)的临床生物学特征及长期预后关系。方法采用流式细胞仪直接免疫荧光法及RT-PCR法分别检测2001年8月至2003年3月在我院收治的初诊高危112例ALL患儿的髓系抗原及融合基因的表达,对其预后进行了中位时间达76个月的长期观察。结果髓系抗原的表达率为30.4%,B系ALL表达髓系抗原多于T系ALL,差异有显著性意义(P=0.019)。My+ALL患儿携带TEL-AML1融合基因者多于My-ALL患儿(P=0.049),My+ALL与My-ALL患儿在临床特点以及疗效等方面两组之间差异无显著性意义。结论高危ALL无论有无髓系抗原的表达其疗效无显著性差异,髓系抗原阳性表达在高危儿童ALL时不能作为预后不良的因素。 Objective To observe myeloid antigen expression and its relationship with clinical and biological features as well as long-term prognosis in children with high-risk (HR) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Methods The expression of myeloid antigen and fusion gene of 112 children with HR-ALL from August of 2001 to March of 2003 were measured respectively by 3-color flow cytometry and RT-PCR, the impact of myeloid antigen expression on clinical prognosis were studied for a median time of 76 months. Results The total positive cases of myeloid antigen expression were 34 (30.4%). Myeloid antigen expression in B-ALL group were significant higher than that in T-ALL group (P = 0. 019) ; TEL/ AML1 positive in My^+ ALL group were more than in My^- ALL group (P =0. 049). There were no significant differences between My^+ ALL group and My^-ALL group in clinical features and treatment outcome. Conclusion Myeloid antigen expression is not an independent prognostic factor in HR-ALL patients.
出处 《中国小儿血液与肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2009年第4期154-157,共4页 Journal of China Pediatric Blood and Cancer
关键词 白血病 淋巴细胞 高危 儿童 抗原 髓系 leukemia lymphoblastic high-risk childhood antigen myeloid
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1小儿急性白血病诊疗建议(修订草案)[J].中华儿科杂志,1993,31(5):285-287. 被引量:167
  • 2Bene MC, Castoldi g, knapp W, et al. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute Lymphoblastic cute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemia (EGIL). Leukemia, 1995 ;9 : 1783-1786.
  • 3李志刚,吴敏媛,赵玮,李彬,杨静,朱平,胡亚美.多重RT-PCR方法同时检测29种白血病融合基因[J].中华血液学杂志,2003,24(5):256-258. 被引量:45
  • 4Uckun FM, Sather HN, Gaynon PS, et al. Clinical features and treatment outcome of children with myeloid antigen positive acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group, Blood, 1997 ;90( 1 ) :28-35.
  • 5Pui CH, Rubnitz JE, Hancock ML, et al. Reappraisal of the clinical and biological significance of myeloid-associated antigen erpression in childhood acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Clin Oncol, 1998; 16 (12) :3768-3773.
  • 6Putti MC, Rondeli R Cocitd MG, et al. Expression of myeloid markers lacks prognostic impact in Children: Italian experience in AIEOP-ALL 88-91 studies[J]. Blood, 1998;92:795-801.
  • 7Goldberg JM, Silverman LB, Levy DE, et al. Childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia consortium experience. J Clin Oncol 2003 ;21:3616-3622.
  • 8Hrusak O, MacDonad AP. Antigen expression patterns reflecting genotype of acute Leukemias. Leukemia, 2002 ; 16 : 1233 -1258.
  • 9Pui CH, Evans WE. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med, 2006;354:166-178.
  • 10Unal S, Cetin M, Tuneer AM, et al. The prognostic impact of myeloid antigen expression in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients. Turk J Pediatr. 2008 Nov-Dec;50(6) :533-536.

二级参考文献1

共引文献210

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部