期刊文献+

论WTO成员方经济主权的让渡与国际责任 被引量:2

Research on Alienating Economic Sovereignty and International Obligations of WTO Members
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在经济全球化背景下,各国要想发挥本国的比较优势,最大限度的增进本国福利,让渡部分经济主权予WTO行使已成为必然的趋势。多边贸易体制是各成员方经济主权让渡与获益多少之间的相互博弈,成员方经济主权的让渡是其承担国际责任的法理基础。与传统国际责任相比,WTO国际责任具有自己突出的特点。中国在履行WTO义务和DSB裁决时,应充分考虑国际责任与国家利益的适当平衡。 Under the backdrop of economic globalization, it is inevitable tendency that every state alienates economic sovereignty to WTO to exercise in order to bring into play native comparative advantages and improve native welfare to the limit of each ability. The multilateral trading system is a mutual game playing between each member alienates economic sovereignty and how much benefit he could get. Alienating economic sovereignty of each member is the legal basis to bear international obligations. The international obligations of each member under WTO has its own feature comparing with traditional international obligations. China should properly balance between our international obligations and our national interest when China fulfill obligations of WTO and verdict of DSB.
作者 王军杰
出处 《青海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2009年第3期6-11,共6页 Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 WTO 国际责任 经济主权 让渡 World Trade Organization international obligation economic sovereignty alienation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1张维迎.理解中国经济改革[J].中国市场,2008(33):15-15. 被引量:11
  • 2[美]伯纳德·霍克曼,迈克尔·考斯泰基.世界贸易体制的政治经济学[M].刘平,洪晓东,许明德等译.北京:法律出版社,1999.15.16.
  • 3[美]威廉·奥尔森.国际关系理论与实践[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.13.
  • 4Petros C. Mavroidis, Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place[J]. European Journal of International Law, 11 (2000).
  • 5WTO Panel Report, US- Import Measures on certain Products from the EC [ R]. WT/DS165/R, circulated 17 July 2000.
  • 6Judith H. Bello, The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More [ J ]. 90 The American Journal International Law416, No. 3, 1996, p. 417.
  • 7Kenneth Waltz.. Theory of International Politics [ M ]. Addison - Wesley, 1999. 328.
  • 8陈安.世纪之交围绕经济主权的新“攻防战”.国际经济法论丛,2000,(4).
  • 9张向晨.发展中国家与WTO的政治关系[M].北京:法律出版社,2003.56.
  • 10WTO Appeallate Bordy Report, Japan - Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS8/AB/R 4 October 1996.

共引文献10

同被引文献43

  • 1张宇,蒋殿春.数字经济下的国际贸易:理论反思与展望[J].天津社会科学,2021(3):84-92. 被引量:33
  • 2徐翔,厉克奥博,田晓轩.数据生产要素研究进展[J].经济学动态,2021(4):142-158. 被引量:167
  • 3曾令良.论冷战后时代的国家主权[J].中国法学,1998(1):109-120. 被引量:119
  • 4李向阳.国际经济规则的形成机制[J].世界经济与政治,2006(9):67-76. 被引量:66
  • 5陈安.美国1994年“主权大辩论”及其后续影响.中国社会科学,2001,.
  • 6Dan Sarooshi. Sovereignty, Economic: Autonomy, the United States, and the International Trading Sys- tem. European Journal of loternational law, 2004(4).
  • 7Daniel Bodansky. "What' s in a Concept ? Global Public Goods, International Law, and Legitimacy. European Journal of International Law, 2012 ( 3 ).
  • 8John O. McGinnis. The World Trade Constitution. Harvard Law Review, 2000(2).
  • 9Helen Stacy. Relational Sovereignty. Stanford Law Review. 2003 (2).
  • 10Kal Raustiala. Rethinking the sovereignty debate in international economic law. Journal of International Economic Law. 2003 (4).

引证文献2

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部