期刊文献+

认知参照点模型与英汉语后指构式 被引量:6

The Cognitive Reference Point Model and Backwards Anaphora Construction in English and Chinese
原文传递
导出
摘要 后指构式是一种常见的照应现象,在英汉语中都有所表现。语料分析表明,典型的后指构式体现为:作为回指语的代词处在前置修饰语中,通常表现为物主代词;作为先行语的名词短语出现在主句的主语位置。英汉语后指构式遵循大致相同的认知原则,即代词与先行语之间存在不对称的认知突显关系,先行语具有更高的突显度,被识解为认知参照点,与其共指的代词处在其领地内。代词及其所在的前置修饰语行使语境化功能,充当语义背景,对先行语概念进行聚焦或前景化。 Backwards anaphora constructions are common both in English and Chinese. Data analyses show that typical backwards anaphora constructions display the following characteristics: the anaphoric pronoun, usually a possessor, is contained in a preposed modifier and the antecedent nominal functions as the subject of the main clause. Both English and Chinese backwards anaphora follow approximately the same cognitive principle, namely, the existence of a prominence asymmetry between the antecedent and the pronoun. The antecedent is the most prominent nominal being construed as the Cognitive Reference Point with the co-referential pronoun falling into its dominion. The pronoun and the preposed modifier where it appears serve the contextualizing function. That is, the pronoun and the preposed modifier are semantically backgrounded, thus making the antecedent conception focused or foregrounded.
作者 李丛禾
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第5期10-14,共5页 Foreign Language Education
关键词 后指构式 突显度 认知参照点 领地 backwards anaphora prominence cognitive reference point dominion
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Ariel, M. Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents [ M ]. London and New York: Roufledge, 1990.
  • 2Bolinger, D. Pronouns in discourse [ A ]. In T. Givon (ed.). Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax [ C ]. NY: Academic Press, 1979.
  • 3Carden, G. Backwards anaphora in discourse context [ J ]. Journal of Linguistics, 1982 (18) :361-387.
  • 4Chafe, W.L. Grammatical subjects in speaking and writing[J]. Text, 1991(11) : 45-72.
  • 5Fauconnier, G. Mental Spaces [ M ]. Cambridge: CUP, 1994.
  • 6Kuno, S. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 1972(3): 269-230.
  • 7Kuno, S. Functional Symtax: Anaphora, Discourse and Empathy[ M ]. Chicago: UCP,1987.
  • 8Langacker, R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites[ M]. Stanford: Stanford University Press,1987.
  • 9Langacker, R.W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. H: Descriptive Application [ M ]. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 10Langacker, R.W. Grammar and Conceptualization[M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1999.

二级参考文献65

共引文献225

同被引文献57

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部