期刊文献+

硬膜外造影后MSCT扫描对腰神经根管狭窄的诊断研究 被引量:2

The Study of Epidurography and Multispiral CT Scanning Examination in the Diagnosis of Lumbar Nerve Root Canal Stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析硬膜外造影后多排螺旋CT扫描(epidurography and multispiral CT scanning,MSCTE)的影像学特点和对腰神经根管狭窄的诊断作用。方法自2007年12月至2008年10月共完成了MSCTE检查29例,26例完善了CT、MRI和MSCTE三项检查,26例中23例进行了手术探查。分析MSCTE的影像学特点,并与CT和MRI影像进行对比研究,对CT、MRI和MSCTE三种影像诊断试验评价的灵敏度、特异度和总符合率进行统计学分析。结果MSCTE能很好地兼顾腰神经根管的骨与软组织界限。CT、MRI和MSCTE诊断神经根管狭窄的灵敏度依次为76.5%、88.2%和94.1%;特异度依次为60.0%、60.0%和80.0%;总的符合率依次为72.7%、81.0%和90.9%。MSCTE对腰神经根管狭窄诊断灵敏度、特异度和总符合率高于CT和MRI。结论MSCTE有其独特的影像学特点,在诊断腰神经根管狭窄方面优于CT和MRI。 Objective To investigate imaging features of epidurography and multispiral CT scanning (MSCTE) and the role in diagnosis of lumbar nerve root canal stenosis. Methods There were 29 patients performed epidurography and multispiral CT scanning from December 2007 to October 2008,and among them 26 patients performed all the three examinations of CT,MRI and MSCTE. 23 patients were undergone surgical treatment. Compared with CT and MRI,the imaging features were investigated,and the sensitivity,specificity and total consistent rate were analyzed. Results MSCTE show the extent of soft tissue as well as bone. The sensitivity of CT,MRI and MSCTE is 76.5%, 88.2% and 94.1% ,specificity 60.0% ,60.0% and 80.0% ,total consistent rate 72.7% ,81.0% and 90.9% respectively for diagnosis of lumbar nerve root canal stenosis. Conclusion With excellent imaging appearance ,MSCTE is better than CT and MRI in diagnosis of lumbar nerve root canal stenosis.
出处 《实用骨科杂志》 2009年第8期567-571,共5页 Journal of Practical Orthopaedics
关键词 硬膜外造影 多排螺旋CT扫描 神经根管狭窄 腰椎 epidurography multispiral CT scanning nerve root canal stenosis lumbar
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Attias N,Hayman A,Hipp JA, et al. Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spine foraminal stenosis-a surgeon's perspective [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2006,19(4):249-256.
  • 2Ros L, Mota J, Guedea A, et al. Quantitative measurements of the spinal cord and canal by MR imaging and myelography[J]. Eur Radiol, 1998, 8 (6) : 966-970.
  • 3Morvan G. Imaging of lumbar stenosis[J] J Radiol, 2002,83(9) :1177-1179.
  • 4Fu YS,Zeng BF,Xu JG. Long-term outcomes of two different decompressive techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Spine, 2008,33(5) : 514-518.
  • 5Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM, et al. Lumbar foraminal stenosis:critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. A cryomicrotome study in cadavera [J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1995,77 (1) : 32-38.
  • 6Lee CK, Rauschning W, Glenn W. Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis : classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression [J]. Spine, 1988, 13 (3) :313-320.
  • 7Zouboulis P,Karaqeorqos A,Dimakopoulos P, et al. Functional outcome of surgical treatment for multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis [J]. Acta Orthop, 2006, 77(4) : 670-676.
  • 8Sirvanci M,Bhatia M,Ganiyusuloglu KA, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: correlation with oswestry disability index and MR imaging [J]. Eur Spine J,2008,17(5) :679-685.
  • 9王勇,范遗恩,翟饶生.腰神经根被膜的显微解剖学观察及其临床意义[J].神经解剖学杂志,2002,18(2):178-180. 被引量:2
  • 10江学成,陈才保.绵羊硬膜外腔慢注和快注碘卡明的局部动力学研究[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1993,13(1):25-27. 被引量:4

二级参考文献14

共引文献24

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部