1Wheatley G H. Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning [ J ]. Science Education, 1991, 75(1):10.
2A. H. Johnstone. (1982). Macro and microchemistry. Notes and Correspondence, 12:377 - 379.
3A. H. Johnstone. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn ? Things are seldom what they seem . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, (7): 75 - 83.
4A.H. Johnstone. (1993). The Development of Chemistry Teaching :A Changing Response to Changing Demand. Journal of Chemical Education, (9): 701-705.
5Dorothy L. Gabd, K. V. Samuel. (1987).Understanding the Particulate Nature of Matter. Journal of Chemical Education, 8: 695 - 697.
6Mary B. Nakhleh, Joseph S. Krajcik. (1994). Influence of Levels of Information as Presented by Different Technologies on Students' Understanding of Acid, Base, and pH Concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 10:1077 - 1096.
7Dorothy Gabel. (1998). The Complexity of Chemistry and Implications for Teaching . In:B.J. Fraser , K.G. Tobin (eds).International Handbook of Scieuce Education, 231 -248.
8Dorothy Gabel. (1994). Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future.Journal of Chemical Education, 4 : 548 - 553.
9Onno de Jong, Jan van Driel. (1999). Prospective teachers' concerns about teaching chemistry topics at a macro - micro - symbolic interface. Paper presented at the 1999 NARST Annual Meeting, Boston, USA, 3.
10Michael E. Hinton, Mary B. Nakhleh. (1999). Students ' Microscopic, Macroscopic, and Symbolic Representations of Chemical Reactions. Chemical Educator, 4: 158- 167.
