期刊文献+

知识创新、动态能力与组织绩效的关系研究 被引量:25

The relationship among knowledge innovation,dynamic capabilities and organizational performance:a structural equation model analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究企业的知识创新、协调整合能力、重组转型能力和组织绩效之间相互影响的机制和路径。通过理论分析建立研究框架,并选取我国珠三角地区317家企业进行实证研究。结果表明,知识创新对组织绩效具有直接正向影响;知识创新对协调整合能力和重组转型能力均具有直接正向影响;协调整合能力对重组转型能力具有直接正向影响;协调整合能力和重组转型能力均可以直接提升绩效水平。本文的研究结果可为中国企业如何有效增强知识创新以提升动态能力和改善组织绩效提供有益的借鉴。 This paper studies the mechanism and route by which knowledge innovation, coordination & integration capability, and reconfiguration & transformation capability impact organizational performance. Through theory analysis, it built a research frame and constructed SEM, and then went on an empirical research on 317 enterprises which come from the Pearl River Delta of Guangdong province. It is proved that knowledge innovation has a positive direct impact on organizational performance; knowledge innovation has a positive direct impact on coordination & integration capability and reconfiguration & transformation capability ; and coordination & integration has a positive direct impact on reconfiguration & transformation capability. Moreover, the results show that coordination & integration capability and reconfiguration & transformation impact organizational performance positively and directly. The main research achievements will be beneficial to Chinese enterprise to promote dynamic capability by knowledge innovation, and improve the organizational performance.
作者 曾萍
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第8期1271-1280,共10页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70832003) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70702023) 教育部博士点基金项目(20070561018)
关键词 知识创新 动态能力 协调整合能力 重组转型能力 组织绩效 knowledge innovation dynamic capabilities coordination & integration capability reconfiguration & transformation capability organizational performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1Powell T. Competitive advantage: logical and philosophical considerations [ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(9): 875-888.
  • 2Rumelt R P, Schendel D E, Teece D J. Fundamental Issues in Strategy [ M ]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994. 9 -47.
  • 3Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17 ( 1 ) : 99 - 120.
  • 4Nielsen A P. Capturing knowledge within a competence [ A]. Khalil T M, Lefebvre L A, Mason R M. Management of Technology: The Key to Prosperity to the Third Millennium [ C]. Oxford: Elsevier Science, 2001. 481 - 490.
  • 5Pai C P. Knowledge strategies in Taiwan' s IC design firms [ J]. Journal of American Academy of Business, 2005, 7(2) : 73 -77.
  • 6Teece D J, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533.
  • 7Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? [ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21 (10) : 1105 -1121.
  • 8Zollo M, Winter S G. Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities [J]. Organization Science, 2002, (13) : 339 -351.
  • 9Zott C. Dynamic capabilities and the emergence of intra- industry differential firm performance [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(1 ): 97- 125.
  • 10Langlois R. Cognition and capabihties: opportunities seized and missed in the history of the computer industry [ A ]. Garud R, Nayeer P, Ghapira Z. Technological Innovation: Oversights and Foresights [ C]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 71 -94.

二级参考文献42

  • 1谢洪明,韩子天.组织学习与绩效的关系:创新是中介变量吗?-珠三角地区企业的实证研究及其启示[J].科研管理,2005,26(5):1-10. 被引量:70
  • 2Kohli & Jaworski, 1990,"Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, & Managerial Implication", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, April, Issue 2:pp.1-18.
  • 3Kumar, K, Subramanian, R. & Yauger, C,1998, "Examining the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship:A Context-Specific Study", Journal of Management, Vol.24, No.2:pp.201-233.
  • 4Langerak, F, 2003, "An Appraisal of Research on the Predietive Power of Market Orientation", European Management Journal, Vol.21, No.4:pp.447-464.
  • 5Mabey C. & Salaman, G, 1995,Strategic Human Resource Management, Oxford:Blackwell.
  • 6March, J, G, and H. Simon, 1958, Organizations,Blackwell Business.
  • 7McKee, D,1992,"An Organizational Learning Approach to Product Innovation", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.9:234.
  • 8Narver, J.C, & Slater, S.F, 1990, "The Effect of A Market Orientation on Business Profitability", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 4:pp.20-35.
  • 9Porter, Michael E,1980, "Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysizing Industrial & Competitors", Blackwell Ingram.
  • 10Slater, S. F. and Narver,J, C,1995, "Market Orientation and the Learning Organization", Journal of Marketing, Vol.59, July:pp.63-74.

共引文献211

同被引文献581

引证文献25

二级引证文献238

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部