期刊文献+

三种生态型大米草在逆境条件下同工酶表达的差异 被引量:3

The Impression of Isozymes in Ecotypes of Spartina AnglicaHubbard Treeted with Environmental Streeses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 三种不同生态型大米草(SpartinaanglicaHubbard)无论在对照还是在温度胁迫下,其5叶期植株叶片内MDH和POD同工酶存在一定的差异。L型和E型的大米草在温度胁迫下,同工酶的变化趋同而有利与P型,且L型和E型大米革的同工酶的变化与其为抗寒生态型的特性相吻合,P型的同工酶变化与其为耐高温生态型的特性相一致,而对于盐胁迫L型和P型大米草的叶片POD同工酶发达趋同,在水淹胁迫下三种生态型大米草5叶期植株叶片内POD同工酶的变化无显著差异,认为三种生态型大米草的遗传结构存在一定的差异,且其差异表现在调节基因上,结构基因则保持一致。 The marked difference in the spectral pattern of iszymes MDH and POD of 3 eco- types of Spartina anglica Hubbard with untreated controls and temperature stressees are ob- served. The change of isozyme patterns in ecotype L and ecotype E tended to be identical .and distinguishable from ecotype P under temperature stresses, which coincided with cold-tolerant characteristics of ecotype L and ecotype E, while the change of isozyme patterns in ecotype P suggested its characteristics of heat tolerance. Similar changes are shown in the patterns of POD isozymes between ecotype L and ecotype P with NaCl stress, differing from that of ecotype E. No significant differences are observed in the patterns of POD isozymes among 3 ecotypes treat- ed with immersion. The study suggested that the differentiation of 3 ecotypes based physically on the differentiation of regulator genes with the same structural genes.
出处 《烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版)》 CAS 1998年第3期188-194,共7页 Journal of Yantai University(Natural Science and Engineering Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金
关键词 大米草 生态型 同工酶 胁迫 温度胁迫 盐胁迫 spartina, ecotype, isozyme, stress
  • 相关文献

同被引文献47

  • 1阮少江.闽东外来生物入侵的初步研究[J].宁德师专学报(自然科学版),2002,14(3):196-198. 被引量:16
  • 2陈国祥,刘冬,魏锦城.盐生植物大米草PSⅡ颗粒的放氧活性及多肽组分[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),1996,19(4):36-39. 被引量:2
  • 3丁建清 王韧 范中南 等.恶性水生杂草-水葫芦在我国的发生危害及其防治[J].杂草学报,1996,9(2):49-52.
  • 4张福绥,何义朝,亓铃欣,孙鲁宁.海湾扇贝引种复状研究[J].海洋与湖沼,1997,28(2):146-152. 被引量:40
  • 5Spartina Task Force.Spartina Management Program: Integrated Weed Management for Private Lands in Willapa Bay, Pacific County, Wash ington[M]. Unpublished report prepared for the Noxious Weed Board and County Commissioners,1994.
  • 6Ian D B, Pim F B, Roland B.Estimating the contribution of Spartina an glica biomass to salt- marsh sediments using compound specific stable carbon isotope measurements[J].Organic Geochemistry,1999,30(7): 477- 483.
  • 7Thompson JD,McNeilly T,Gray AJ. Population variation in Spartina anglica C E Hubbard. II. Reciprocal transplants among three succes sional populations[J].New Phytologist,1991,117:129- 139.
  • 8Mei- Yin Wua, Sally Hackerb, Debra Ayresc. Potential of Prokelisia spp. as Biological Control Agents of English Cordgrass, Spartina an glica[J].Biological Control, 1999,16(3):267- 273.
  • 9Baumel A,Ainouche M L,LevasseurJE.Molecular investigations in popu lations of Spartina anglica C E Hubbard (Poaceae) invading coastal Brit tany[J].Mol Ecol,2001,10(1): 689- 701.
  • 10Chung C- H.Twenty- five years of introduced Spartina anglica in China[A]. In: Gray A J and Benham P E M,eds.Spartina anglica- a Research Review[C], HMSO,London,1990.72- 76.

引证文献3

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部