期刊文献+

结构耐火设计中室内温度预测模型的对比研究 被引量:3

Comparative study on the prediction model of enclosure temperature in fire resistance design
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于现场实验的实验结果,对比研究了《建筑钢结构防火技术规范》推荐的单区域模型和CFA ST双区域模型两种室内温度预测模型。结果表明,《建筑钢结构防火技术规范》推荐的单区域模型用于结构耐火设计时的温度预测是合适的。当火源功率较小时,CFA ST会过高预测热烟气层的温度值;火源功率较大时,CFA ST与其模型假定不符,难以得出正确的结果。而一般结构耐火设计时的火源功率都较大,因此CFA ST不适用于结构耐火设计时的温度预测。 Based on the result of the spot experiments, the onezone enclosure temperature prediction model recommended by technical code and the two-zone model from CFAST were comparatively studied. The result showed that the one-zone model is appropriate to predict the temperature during the fire resistance design; CFAST will result in a higher prediction of the smoke layer when the fire load density is low, and when the fire load density is high, the model will have a screw loose and can not get the right result. Thereby CFAST model is not suitable for temperature prediction in fire resistance design to buildings, as the fire load density is mostly huge.
作者 李胜利
出处 《消防科学与技术》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第8期560-562,共3页 Fire Science and Technology
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2006BAK06B05-1)
关键词 耐火设计 火灾场景 区域模型 CFAST fire resisting design fire scenario zone model CFAST
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Bjorn Karlsson, James G Quintiere. Enclosure Fire Dynamics [M]. New York: CRC Press, 2000.
  • 2T Z Harmathy. A new look at compartment fires part Ⅰ[J].Fire Technology, 1972, (8) : 326- 351.
  • 3CECS200:2006,建筑钢结构防火技术规范[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2006.
  • 4屈立军.建筑结构性能化耐火设计[M].廊坊:中国人民武装警察部队学院出版社,2004.
  • 5CFAST Technical Reference Guide[R]. WASHINGTON: NIST, 2006.
  • 6Verification and Validation of Selected Fire Models for Nuclear Power Plant Applications, Volume 5 : Consolidated Fire and Smoke Transport Model (CFAST)[R]. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research (RES), Roekville, MD, 2007, and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto, CA, NUREG-1824 and EPRI 101199.

共引文献1

同被引文献15

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部