摘要
传统民法理论关于支配权与请求权的区分值得商榷。所谓支配权,并非某种类型的民事权利,而是所有权利人对其民事权利范围的控制属性,物权具有支配性,债权也具有支配性。所谓请求权,都是权利人在其原有权遭受侵害后所享有的以恢复原有权的内涵利益为内容的救济权,独立的请求权是不存在的。抗辩权和形成权根本不是民事权利。民事权利应当区分为原有权和救济权两个层次。
It is worth further discussing the distinction between the dominant right and the request right in traditional civil law. The dominant right is not a kind of civil right, it is the control property of the civil right-owned people. The property right as well as the debt right has the feature of domi- nance. The so-called request right is the relief right that the right owned people request to restore when their original right suffers infringement. Therefore the individual request right does not exist. The defensive right and the formation right are not civil rights. The civil right can be classified into o- riginal right and relief right.
出处
《西北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2009年第4期114-119,共6页
Journal of Northwest Minzu University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金项目<请求权与民事责任的关系研究>(05CFX008)的阶段性成果
关键词
支配权
请求权
区分标准
民事权利体系
dominant right
request right
distinctive criteria
civil right system