期刊文献+

光皮桦细根与扁穗牛鞭草草根分解的土壤微生物数量及优势类群 被引量:16

Varieties of soil microorganisms decomposing Betula luminifera fine roots and Hemarthria compressa roots
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过室内模拟试验研究向土壤添加单一光皮桦直径为0~1mm细根(处理1)、1~2mm细根(处理2)、扁穗牛鞭草草根(处理3)、0~2mm细根与扁穗牛鞭草草根混合物(处理4)分解过程中土壤微生物数量以及微生物优势类群的变化。结果表明,120d后,与未加植物根系的对照相比各处理都显著的增加了土壤微生物的数量,其中细根、草根混合处理的微生物总数大于添加单一细根和草根的处理(P〈0.05)。真菌在分解过程中占主要地位,其次是放线菌,最后是细菌。对土壤微生物进行分离、纯化、鉴定出参与细根、草根分解初期的主要优势类群是假单胞菌属(Pseudomonas)、木霉菌属(Trichoderma)、游动放线菌属(Actinoplanes),在培养后期(120d后)起主要作用的优势类群是芽孢杆菌属(Bacillus)、曲霉属(Aspergillus)、青霉属(Penicillium)、链霉菌属(Streptomyces)、诺卡氏菌属(Nocardia)。8种土壤微生物优势类群数量在分解过程中未表现出明显的变化规律,但分解120d后,各处理优势类群的数量显著大于对照(P〈0.05)。由此可见,细根、草根的不同处理对其分解过程中土壤微生物数量及种类有较大影响,不同的分解阶段发育着不同的土壤微生物。 Fine root decomposition often plays an important role in maintaining soil fertility and mass nutrient cycling in soil ecosystems. As irreplaceable decomposers of fine roots, soil microorganisms are closely linked to bioelement components. Birch (Betula luminifera)-grass (Hemarthria compressa) is a successful forest and grass compound model for converting farmland to forest and is beneficial to the development of the environment and economy. There is a lack of information on quantities of soil microbes in relation to fine root decomposition and few published reports on soil microorganisms in birch-grass plantations. Therefore, soil microbial amount and dominant microbial groups during decomposition of fine roots and grass roots were investigated in order to obtain an understanding of the mechanisms of fine root decomposition. Birch fine roots and grass roots from a birch-grass compound model in converting farmland to forest in Hongya, Sichuan, were used in a 120-d laboratory incubation experiment. The roots were mixed with the same soil in the following five treatments. 1) 0-1 mm birch fine roots, 2) 1-2 mm birch fine roots, 3) grass roots, 4) 0-2 mm birch fine roots+grass roots, and 5) no roots (CK). Treatments of addition of fine roots (and grass roots) significantly increased soil microbial content. The ranked orders of total microbial content were: Treatment 4〉treatment 3 = treatment 1 treatment 2 (P〈0.05). Fungi played a more important role in fine root decomposition than bacteria and actinomycetes. Eight dominant microbial groups were isolated and identified. Pseudomonas, Trichoderma, and Actinoplanes played the most important role at the initial phase of fine and grass root decomposition, while Bacillus, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Streptomyces, and Nocardia dominated the later phase of decomposition. Regular fluctuations were not observed during the first 120 d of the decomposition processes but after 120 d eight dominant microbial groups increased significantly (P〈0.05). The different treatments with birch fine roots and grass roots greatly influenced soil microbial amount and the dominant microbial groups in root decomposition.
出处 《草业学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第4期117-124,共8页 Acta Prataculturae Sinica
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(30771717) 国家"十一五"科技支撑项目(2006BAC01A11) 国家教育部重点学科博士点基金(20050626001) 四川省教育厅重点实验室项目(2006ZD006)资助
关键词 细根 草根 分解 土壤微生物 退耕还林 fine root grass root decomposition soil microorganism conversion of farmland to forest
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Silver W L,Miya R K. Global patterns in root decomposition: Comparisons of climate and litter quality effects[J]. Oecologia, 2001,129: 407-419.
  • 2廖利平,邓仕坚,于小军,韩士杰.不同连栽代数杉木人工林细根生长、分布与营养物质分泌特征[J].生态学报,2001,21(4):569-573. 被引量:48
  • 3丁玲玲,祁彪,尚占环,龙瑞军,陈秀蓉,徐长林,周启星.东祁连山亚高山草地土壤微生物功能群数量动态及其与土壤环境关系[J].草业学报,2007,16(2):9-18. 被引量:26
  • 4Osnono T. Clonization and succession of fungi during decomposition of Swida controversa leaf litter[J]. Mycologia, 2005, 97(3):589-597.
  • 5Osono T. Phyllosphere fungi on leaf litter of Fagus crenata : Occurrence, colonization, and successionEJ~. Canada Joural Botany,2002,80 : 460-469.
  • 6Koide K,Osono T,Takeda H. Fungal succession and decomposition of Camellia japonica leaf litter[J]. Ecological Research, 2005,20:559-609.
  • 7Osno T, Hirose D,Fjimaki R. Fungal colonization as affected by litter depth and decomposition stage of needle litter[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2006,38 :2743-2752.
  • 8Schaefer M. The soil fauna of a beech forest on limestone: Trophic structure and energy budget[J]. Oecologia,1990,82:128- 136.
  • 9Topoliantz S,Ponge J F,Viaux P. Earthworm and enchytraeid activities under different arable farming systems,as exemplified by biogenic structures[J]. Plant and Soil,2000,225 : 39-51.
  • 10Grizalle G,Seastedt T R. Soil fauna and plant litter decomposition in tropical and subalpine forests[J]. Ecology, 2001,82:955- 964.

二级参考文献290

共引文献1001

同被引文献304

引证文献16

二级引证文献231

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部