期刊文献+

班固“误读”《史记》原因解析

Analysis the Reasons of Ban Gu's Misreading of Records of the Historian
下载PDF
导出
摘要 班固称赞司马迁"有良史之材,"《史记》是"不虚美,不隐恶"的实录之作,同时又批评司马迁"非谊士",《史记》有"史公三失"。这种矛盾是由于班固在写作中,因无法摆脱司马迁的影响而产生焦虑,进而"误读"《史记》所致。 The historical ideas of Sigma Qian and Ban Gu are analyzed in this paper. They had many similar ideas and also many differences in historical ideas and historical background. The reason of these differences is due to the various cultural conditions and general moods of their times as well as their personal ideological differences.
作者 吕维洪
机构地区 曲靖师范学院
出处 《楚雄师范学院学报》 2009年第7期87-91,97,共6页 Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
关键词 《史记》 《汉书》 批评 影响的焦虑 Records of the Historian Chronicles of the Han Dynasty critique influencing wor-riment
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

  • 1林东海导读,刘大杰.魏晋思想论[M]上海古籍出版社,1998.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部