摘要
班固称赞司马迁"有良史之材,"《史记》是"不虚美,不隐恶"的实录之作,同时又批评司马迁"非谊士",《史记》有"史公三失"。这种矛盾是由于班固在写作中,因无法摆脱司马迁的影响而产生焦虑,进而"误读"《史记》所致。
The historical ideas of Sigma Qian and Ban Gu are analyzed in this paper. They had many similar ideas and also many differences in historical ideas and historical background. The reason of these differences is due to the various cultural conditions and general moods of their times as well as their personal ideological differences.
出处
《楚雄师范学院学报》
2009年第7期87-91,97,共6页
Journal of Chuxiong Normal University
关键词
《史记》
《汉书》
批评
影响的焦虑
Records of the Historian
Chronicles of the Han Dynasty
critique
influencing wor-riment