期刊文献+

GDSS环境下匿名决策对群决策效果影响的实验研究

Experimental Study on the Effects of Anonymity on Decision Making of GDSS Group
原文传递
导出
摘要 GDSS的使用带来了匿名性的问题,为了检测在中国文化环境下匿名决策对群组性能的影响,设计了一个2因子的实验群组,群组大小为3。结果显示在决策质量方面匿名群组和非匿名群组没有表现出差别,但是,匿名情况下出现决策迁移的现象比非匿名情况下少。最后对结果进行了探讨。 In view of the problem of anonymity produced by GDSS, this paper examines the effects of anonymity on group decision making and decision shift in Chinese cultural context by designing a 2-factorial experiment group whose size is three. The Results indicated that there were no differences in decision quality between the anonymous groups and the identified groups, but there were fewer decision shifts in the former than in the latter. Finally the implications of these findings are discussed.
机构地区 中南大学商学院
出处 《系统工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第7期69-74,共6页 Systems Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(70631004)
关键词 群决策支持系统 匿名性 决策质量 决策迁移 中国文化 GDSS Anonymity Decision Quality Decision Shift Chinese Culture
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Nunamaker J F Jr, et al. Lessons learned from a dozen years of group support systems research[J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1996-1997,13(3):163-207.
  • 2Klein E E, et al. The role of computer support tools and gender composition in innovative information system idea generation by small groups [J]. Computers in Human Behavior,2000,16:111-139.
  • 3Hayne S C, et al. Attribution accuracy when using anonymity in group support systems[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 1997,47 : 429-452.
  • 4徐晓霞,王刊良,席酉民,汪应洛.群体支持系统过程支持中匿名强度的研究[J].管理科学学报,1998,1(2):57-61. 被引量:2
  • 5郑全全,李宏.面对面和计算机群体决策在观点产生上的比较[J].心理学报,2003,35(4):492-498. 被引量:12
  • 6Rebman,Carl Michael,Jr. An examination of factors that impact end user acceptance of speech recognition technology in electronic meetings[D]. The University of Mississippi, 2001.
  • 7Pinsonneault A, et al. Anonymity in group support systems research : a new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework[J]. Journal of Manage- ment Information Systems, 1997/1998, 14 (3) : 89 108.
  • 8Mennecke B E, Wheeler B C. An essay and resource guide for dyadic and group task selection and usage [Z]. Is world research tasks repository at http:// wheeler, kelley, indiana, edu/isworld.
  • 9Dennis A R. Information exchange and use in group decision making:you can lead a group to information, but you can't make it think [J]. MIS Quarterly, 1996,20(4) : 433- 457.
  • 10Kalvenes J. The economics of group decision support systems[D]. Vanderbilt University,1996.

二级参考文献11

  • 1王垒,组织管理心理学,1993年
  • 2廖世昌,会议管理,1992年,11页
  • 3Wang Z M, Xu L C. Studies on managerial psychology (in Chinese). In: Wang S, Lin Z X, Qing Q C ed. Psychological Science in China. Chiangchun: Ji Lin Education Press, 1997. 1055-1067(王重鸣,徐联仓.管理心理学研究. 见:王甦,林仲贤,荆其诚主编.中国心理科学.长春:吉林教育出版社,1997. 1055-1067)
  • 4Siegel J, Dubrovsky V, Kiesler S. Group processes in computer-mediated communication. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986,37(1): 157~187
  • 5McGuire T W, Kiesler S, Siegel J. Group and computer-mediated discussion effects in risk decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987, 52(5): 917~930
  • 6Kiesler S, Sproull L. Group decision making and communication technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992, 52(1): 96~123
  • 7Lam S S, Schaubroeck J. Improving group decisions by better pooling information: a comparative advantage of group decision support systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(4): 565~573
  • 8Valacich S, Dennis R. Idea generation in computer-based groups: a new ending to an old story. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1994, 57(3 ): 448~467
  • 9Beach L R. The psychology of decision making-people in organizations, Sage Publications, Inc, 1997. 133~135
  • 10Dennis R, Valacich S. Computer brainstorms: more heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(4): 531~537

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部