期刊文献+

单侧经椎间孔入路椎间植骨融合术对慢性下腰痛的疗效分析 被引量:12

Effects of unilateral tansforaminal lumbar interbody fusion on chronic low back pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价单侧经椎间孔入路椎间植骨融合术(TLIF)对慢性下腰痛的临床疗效。方法:应用TLIF治疗慢性下腰痛患者39例,分别使用日本骨科学会(JOA)下腰痛评分标准和Oswestry下腰痛功能障碍问卷调查表(ODI评分表)对所选病例在术前1 d和术后6个月进行评分。结果:入选病例随访时间7-34个月,平均21.4个月。JOA评分组术后6个月评分改善率为(74.42±11.96)%,与ODI评分组的(75.17±10.56)%相比,P〉0.05。JOA评分组改善优良率为94.87%,与ODI评分组的92.31%相比,P〉0.05。两种评价方法在患者的术后改善率及改善优良率方面无统计学差异。结论:TLIF手术方式对主要以腰椎不稳症和(或)腰椎间盘突出症所致的慢性下腰痛近期疗效满意,安全可靠。 Objective To evaluate the effects of unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF) on chronic low back pain.Methods Thirty-nine eligible patients who had suffered from chronic low back pain were treated by TLIF.The treatment outcomes were evaluated by using the criteria for low back pain syndrome of Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) and Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire respectively 1 day prior to surgery and 6 months after operation.Results All eligible cases were followed-up for 7 to 34 months with an average time of 21.4 months.The improvement rate for the JOA group averaged(74.42±11.96)% compared with(75.17±10.56)% for the ODI group(P〉0.05).The improvement rate in 94.87% patients of the JOA group was better or excellent compared with 92.31% for the ODI group(P〉0.05).No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups.Conclusion TLIF technique is a safe and effective procedure with satisfactory clinical results for the treatment of chronic low back pain mainly caused by lumbar instability and(or) protrusion of the lumbar intervertebral disc.
出处 《东南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2009年第3期221-225,共5页 Journal of Southeast University(Medical Science Edition)
关键词 慢性下腰痛 单侧经椎间孔入路椎间植骨融合术 腰椎不稳症 腰椎间盘突出症 疗效 chronic low back pain unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion lumbar instability protrusionof the lumbar intervertebral disc treatment effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献72

  • 1张宝庆,李光照,左尧林.国人脊柱的观察二、椎间盘的测量[J].解剖学通报,1984(4):330-333. 被引量:12
  • 2王建,周跃,张峡,初同伟,张正丰.显微内镜腰椎间盘髓核摘除术疗效预测因素的初步研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2004,2(3):129-132. 被引量:12
  • 3陈静,吴青,杨磊.腰椎间盘突出症患者疼痛的病例对照研究[J].中国医师杂志,2004,6(8):1022-1024. 被引量:3
  • 4袁文,王新伟,陈德玉,张竟,刘百峰.USS椎弓根钉系统治疗下腰椎骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(11):1229-1231. 被引量:19
  • 5杨惠林 唐天驷.腰椎不稳与椎管狭窄专题研讨会纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14:60-60.
  • 6杨惠林.腰椎不稳与腰椎管狭窄专题研究会纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,1994,14(1):60-63.
  • 7Tsuji T,Matsuyama Y,Sato K,et al.Epidemiology of low back pain in the elderly:correlation with lunbar lordosis[J].J Orthop Sci,2001,6(4):307-311.
  • 8Gordon F,Bruce I,B Sele Musa,et al.A 10-year follow-up of the outcome of lumbar microdiscectomy[J].Spine, 1998,23 (18):1168-1171.
  • 9Fritz JM,Irrgang JJ.A comparison of amodified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability scale[J].Phys Ther,2001,81(2):776-788.
  • 10Farrar JT,Yong JP Jr,LaMoreaux L,et al. clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensty measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale[J].Pain,2001,94(2): 149-158.

共引文献647

同被引文献91

引证文献12

二级引证文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部