期刊文献+

试论北宋政治的准宪政特征 被引量:1

On the Quasi-constitutional Characteristics of the North Song Dynasty
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宪政之基本精神是以根本大法限制最高政治权力。宋代中国政治已经具有若干接近于宪政的准宪政特征:宋太祖、太宗的家法,实际上是宋代政权的组织原则,在约束皇权方面,相当于一部高级法在发挥作用;北宋皇权、相权、台谏三权并立,是有效防止权力滥用的制度敷设;北宋的文官制度,以科举考试、业绩考核、高薪养官等制度为中心,已具有现代西方文官制度的雏形;北宋的党争,以政见之不同为主要争论中心,可谓政党政治的雏形。北宋的准宪政政治对宋代社会产生了重大影响。 It is the core of the constitutionalism that the supreme political power should be limited by the constitution. There were already a lot of quasi-constitutional characteristics in Chinese politics of the Song Dynasty. The family laws by the emperor Song-Tai-Zu and the emperor Song-Tai-Zong were actually the frameworks of the regime of the Song Dynasty, which function as a constitution limiting the power of the emperors. In the North Song Dynasty, the powers of the emperors, the ministers, and their watchdogs were coexistent, which was effective in avoiding the abuse of power. The civilian system of the North Song Dynasty, which included imperial examinations, assessing the achievements and high payments for the officials, rudiment characteristics of modern civihan systems of the western countries. The competitions between the parties in the North Song Dynasty, which focused on the differences of policies, also possessed some rudiment characteristics of party politics. The quasi-constitutional politics of the North Song Dynasty had important effects on the society of the Song Dynasty.
作者 龙异
出处 《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第4期109-114,共6页 Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词 北宋 政治 宪政 准宪政 the North Song Dynasty politics constitutionalism quasi-constitutionalism
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fred Rosen (University College London), What is Constitutionalism, Workshop on Constitutionalism: Europe and China, Center for European Studies of Peking University & The Institute of Comparative Law and Legal Sociology, 2001,4, unpublished.
  • 2邱添生.近代日本的中国史研究-以时代区分论为中心.师大历史学报(台),1991,6.
  • 3[法]弗朗斯瓦·魁奈.中华帝国的专制制度[M].谈敏,译.北京:商务印书馆,1992.
  • 4梁启超.王安石传[M].海南:海南出版社,1993:16.
  • 5柳诒微.中国文化史[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1988.
  • 6[德]马克斯·韦伯 王容芬 译.儒教与道教[M].北京:商务印书馆,1995..
  • 7Brian E. McKnight, Village and Bureaucracy in Southern Sung China, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1971:9.
  • 8王国维.王观堂先生全集[C].台北:文华出版公司,1979:1927.
  • 9[美]许倬云.从历史看组织[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000:130.
  • 10[美]华勒斯坦,等.开放社会科学[C].刘锋,译.北京:三联书店,1997:53.

共引文献47

同被引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部