期刊文献+

布洛芬与吲哚美辛治疗早产儿动脉导管未闭的疗效及安全性对比研究 被引量:8

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Oral Ibuprofen or Indomethacin for Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Premature Infants
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比观察口服布洛芬与吲哚美辛对早产儿动脉导管未闭(PDA)的疗效及安全性。方法将近3a收治的36例PDA早产儿作为布洛芬组。于出生2~7d分3次予口服布洛芬治疗,首剂给予10mg/kg,于24h、48h后再分别给予5mg/kg。将2003年6月-2005年12月采用吲哚美辛治疗的33例PDA早产儿作为吲哚美辛组。服药首剂0.2mg/kg,间隔12h1次,共3次。观察二组疗效和不良反应。结果布洛芬组PDA关闭29例(80.56%),吲哚美辛组关闭27例(81.82%),二组比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.02P>0.05)。布洛芬组5d前与5d后用药关闭率分别为91.30%、61.54%(21/23例、8/13例),二者比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.70P<0.05);吲哚美辛组5d前及5d后用药关闭率分别为95.0%、61.54%(19/20例、8/13例),二者比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.93P<0.05)。布洛芬组与吲哚美辛组比较5d前与5d后用药关闭率均无统计学差异。布洛芬组发生不良反应6例(16.67%),吲哚美辛组发生不良反应16例(48.48%),二组比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.03P<0.01)。结论口服布洛芬治疗早产儿PDA疗效与吲哚美辛相当,但前者不良反应少,安全系数高。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of oral ibuprofen or indomethacin for the closure of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in premature infants. Methods Thirty - six cases of premature infants with PDA during latest 3 years were assigned into the ibupro- fen group and received oral ibuprofen suspension ( 10 mg/kg followed by 2 doses of 5 mg/kg after 24 hours,48 hours) postnatal 3 to 7 days. Thirty - three cases of premature infants with PDA from Jan. 2003 to Dec. 2005 were assigned into indomethacin group and received oral indomethacin (0.2 mg/kg every 12 hours for 3 doses). The effectiveness and adverse effects of both groups after treated were observed. Results The rate of ductal closure in ibuprofen group was 80.56% (29/36 cases) and that in indomethacin group was 81.82% (27/33 cases) ,there was no significant difference between 2 groups (χ^2 = 0.02 P 〉 0.05 ). In ibuprofen group, the rate of ductal closure, when ibuprefen was used either before or after 5 days,was 91.30% (21/23 cases) or 61.54% (8/13 cases), respectively, there was significant difference between 2 groups 0(χ^2 = 4.70 P 〈 0.05 ). In indomethacin group, the rates of ductal closure were similar to those of ibuprofen group. But there was no significant difference between 2 groups when ibuprofen or indomethacin was used either before or after 5 days. The incidence of adverse effects in ibuprofen group (6 cases, 16.67% ) was significantly lower than that in .indomethacin group ( 16 cases, 48.48% ) (χ^2= 8.03 P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions The efficacy of ibuprofen for the closure of PDA in premature infants is similar to indomethacin, but ibuprofen has less adverse effects and higher safety than indomethacin.
出处 《实用儿科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第16期1267-1269,共3页 Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
基金 武汉市卫生局临床医学科研项目资助(WX0807)
关键词 布洛芬 吲哚美辛 动脉导管未闭 婴儿 早产 ibuprofen indomethacin patent ductus arteriosus infant, premature
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1黄柏枝,陈就好,麦润婵,王德胜.布洛芬治疗早产儿动脉导管未闭效果及影响因素[J].实用儿科临床杂志,2007,22(13):1015-1016. 被引量:13
  • 2Sekar KC, Corff KE. Treatment of patent ductus arteriosus : Indomethacin or ibuprofen[J].J Perinatol,2008,28 ( suppl 1 ) :60 - 62.
  • 3Hammerman C, Shchors I, Jacobson S, et al. Ibuproten versus continuous indomethacin in premature neonates with patent ductus arteriosus:Is the difference in the mode of administration [ J ] ? Pediatr Res, 2008,64 (3) :291 -297.
  • 4胡央波.布洛芬治疗早产儿动脉导管未闭疗效观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2007,17(6):343-344. 被引量:2
  • 5Pai VB, Sakadjian A, Puthoff TD. Ibuprofen lysine for the prevention and treatment of patent ductas arteriosas [ J ]. Pharmacotherapy, 2008,28 (9) :1162 - 1182.
  • 6杨传忠,李隽.吲哚美辛治疗极低出生体重儿动脉导管未闭及相关因素分析[J].中华儿科杂志,2007,45(1):69-72. 被引量:6
  • 7杨春,张春秀,徐桂玲.口服布洛芬混悬剂治疗早产儿动脉导管未闭的疗效观察[J].实用医学杂志,2006,22(15):1811-1812. 被引量:5
  • 8Su BH, Lin HC, Chiu HY, et al. Comparison of ibuprofen and indometacin for early - targeted treatment of patent ductus arteriosus in extremely premature infants:A randomised controlled trial[ J/OL]. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2008,93 (2) :94 - 99.
  • 9Rheinlaender C, Helfenstein D ,Walch E ,et al. Total serum bilirubin levels during cyclooxygenase inhibitor treatment for patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants [ J ]. Acta Paediatr,2009,98 (1) :36 -42.
  • 10Hermes - DeSantis ER, Clyman RI. Patent ductus arteriosus : Pathophysiology and management[ J]. J Perinato1,2006,26( suppl 1 ) :14 -18.

二级参考文献32

共引文献19

同被引文献53

引证文献8

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部